Jump to content
Age of History Games

TimDee58

Prince
  • Content Count

    65
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

Reputation Activity

  1. Haha
    TimDee58 got a reaction from quatroNN in Medieval age Scenarios (683~1429)   
    Hi, are any of these completed yet?
    Do they have functioning events and Holy Roman Empire please (and REAL rulers from their time period instead of the appalling ones in the vanilla game - no offence Lucasz but I've had Maximillian I of Bavaria as my ruler now for more decades than a good diet & healthy lifestyle should allow, and I think he's Bavaria's default ruler in EVERY scenario I've played, these have spanned from 900AD to 1440AD - it's a little bit irritating lol)?
    Also, please detail installation instructions for dummies like me.....
     
  2. Like
    TimDee58 reacted to Istria in Medieval age Scenarios (683~1429)   
    Wow you've add so many leaders… that's impressive! 
  3. Like
    TimDee58 reacted to PLe2 in Medieval age Scenarios (683~1429)   
    Update,If you find bugs, please tell me.
  4. Like
    TimDee58 reacted to PLe2 in Medieval age Scenarios (683~1429)   
    This weekend, Too much time is spent on leader and event chain.
  5. Like
    TimDee58 reacted to Norlion in Medieval age Scenarios (683~1429)   
    Best scenario series ever!!!!!!
  6. Like
    TimDee58 reacted to PLe2 in Medieval age Scenarios (683~1429)   
    Yes.
  7. Like
    TimDee58 got a reaction from PLe2 in Medieval age Scenarios (683~1429)   
    Excellent work again!
  8. Like
    TimDee58 reacted to Eyeless_Seth in GUYS HE HAS GIVEN A RESPONSE, IL SHOW HERE   
    Oh fuck off troll! And leave lukasz alone already I mean god damn!
  9. Like
    TimDee58 got a reaction from PLe2 in Medieval age Scenarios (683~1429)   
    That's fine, I'm happy to wait.......
    FYI I honestly think that your scenarios should be packaged with the game because (aside from 2 minor errors*) they are perfect & 'well rounded'
    * The region of Spain you call Murica should be Murcia, also for some reason some of the maps show 2 cities called Besancon (in different regions).
    Otherwise yours are the VERY BEST scenario's that I've seen!
  10. Like
    TimDee58 reacted to PLe2 in Medieval age Scenarios (683~1429)   
    Plus Government List 
       Christian: Empire, Kingdom, Duchy, County
       Islamic : Caliphate, Sultanate,Emirate
       Japan : shogunate, Daimyo
       Tibet : monastic Fedual
       Truks: Ottoman, Turks
    I will update that after 2 week. If you have ideas please tell me
  11. Like
    TimDee58 got a reaction from PLe2 in Medieval age Scenarios (683~1429)   
    Sure...
    Christian Kingdom
    Christian Duchy
    Christian County
    Islamic Sultanate
    Islamic Caliphate
    Islamic Emirate
    Pagan Kingdom / Duchy / County
    Heretical Kingdom / Duchy / County
    Excommunicated Kingdom / Duchy / County
    I'm sure there are many more options but I'm a bit rushed for time at present.
  12. Like
    TimDee58 reacted to PLe2 in Medieval age Scenarios (683~1429)   
    Update!
  13. Like
    TimDee58 got a reaction from Ramiro007 in Scenario Suggestions   
    any feudal scenario with working HRE, real (contemporary) family names for rulers and cool (realistic) events.... ideally on a map of about 1100ad
     
    I WOULD do this but I have more pressing real life issues to deal with....
  14. Like
    TimDee58 reacted to PLe2 in Medieval age Scenarios (683~1429)   
    926
  15. Like
    TimDee58 reacted to Arbeloa22 in MOAR provinces mod   
    Realistic/Historical provinces is better than bigger or smaller provinces
  16. Like
    TimDee58 got a reaction from krauser3ful in Dynasty Mod   
    Before I start on this Mod i need to ask a few questions from experienced modders, I think that AoC2 has a lot of potential, do any of you forsee whether any of the following problems will be unworkable in the game?
    I was always a big fan of a few board games that are crying out to be resurrected on the PC, these being Kingmaker, Empires of the Middle Ages and Blood Royale.
    So here is the outline....
    1 - Instead of Immortal rulers (which seems to be the case in the game) why not just use the ruling families name instead in other words Wittelsbach instead of Maximillian II etc... no more immortal leader, merely a continuation of the ruling house? 
    2 - The colouring of regions, instead of the generic racial definitions why not mark areas that 'could' be united and players could dominate them (by achieving superiority in those regions) to form real countries (for example by owning all of the key areas in Britain you 'could' create the Kingdoms of England (or Scotland in the north / wales in the west etc) or even 'ahistorical potential kingdoms (like making a Burgundian kingdom with elements of France, Germany and the low countries).
    3 - Taking into account points 1 & 2 the player states could be named after the ruling family or indeed the local areas they hold... so in effect England, at game start could be called (possibly bad examples) Northumbria under the Percy House, Lancaster (Plantagenets), York (also the Plantagenets, albeit a rival branch of the family) etc etc...
    4 - Events - Dynastic unions, Leader dies heirless, famines, revolts, civil wars,etc etc
    5 - Key areas could be placed that, upon capture grant new titles to the owner (all players could start as Counts, having taken say 3 or so areas become Dukes, and all of the key areas in a region King etc). So no more Monarchies, rather something else which it based n a real feudal pyramid of power.... Count, Duke, King, Emperor etc etc.
    4 - For non christian (or competing types of christians, orthodox etc etc)areas the same could be applied using appropriate titles specific to those areas.
    Of course in history many families owned lands in more than one region (kingdom) which would allow them to develop power bases across the globe (well Europe and the Middle east at least)
    I'm reasonably certain that  the system will allow this, I just need confirmation.
    Related questions
    Is there an upper limit to the number of states allowed?
    Can the current flags be replaced with a shield icon? (not a deal breaker)
    Lastly, can you add any suggestions please?
    Also can anyone explain to me how the Holy Roman empire in the 1440 scenario works because I havent figured it out yet lol.
     
    Thanks for reading
     
  17. Like
    TimDee58 got a reaction from PLe2 in Medieval age Scenarios (683~1429)   
    I'm very excited about the new scenario too, every time I think of a new set of options it seems that you've already beaten me to it.... so here's one for you, 843 AD Treaty of Verdun!
    That would be awesome!
    I give you a score of 100/100 for entertainment and research!
    I'm totally in favour of your work, please keep going!
    (Your scenarios should be packaged with the basic game - they are way better than everything else I've seen!)
    Thank you for your hard work
    Tim
    (AKA - Lothar the Fifth(ish), recreator of the Middle kingdom)
    (Iron Throne Rules)
  18. Like
    TimDee58 reacted to hassan in Medieval age Scenarios (683~1429)   
    It would also be cool to see a branching out of scenarios in 1600 - 1800
  19. Like
    TimDee58 got a reaction from giannisgkouv2 in Ideology Overhaul   
    I've already made a suggestion that has had a positive response that would sort the religion issue
  20. Like
    TimDee58 got a reaction from Ramiro007 in A request   
    I'm starting to work on creating a scenario for the period 900 - 1000 ad, they will be included in that...
  21. Like
    TimDee58 reacted to Ramiro007 in Religion Mod   
    Well thats an excellent solution! i never thought about it that way.
  22. Like
    TimDee58 got a reaction from PETER in REBOOT | Armolitskiy's MOD [Improvments, additions]   
    would you be prepared` to consider creating different levels of Monarchy:
    1 - Emperor
    2 - King
    3 - Duke / Count / Earl (same thing different regional names)
    also:
    1 - Sultan
    2 - Caliph
    3 - Emir
    This distinction would remove the need to worry about adding religions also it would be useful for Feudal & Medieval scenarios.
  23. Confused
    TimDee58 got a reaction from Armolitskiy in REBOOT | Armolitskiy's MOD [Improvments, additions]   
    Okay, thats cool, guess I'll just have to do it myself....... (altho i have no idea where to start lol)
  24. Dislike
    TimDee58 got a reaction from Armolitskiy in REBOOT | Armolitskiy's MOD [Improvments, additions]   
    I guess they would all still be classed as 'Monarchy' perhaps with just minor differences according to rank? what do you suggest?
  25. Like
    TimDee58 got a reaction from Victor in Surely Religion is an ideology?   
    Pagan too
×
×
  • Create New...