Eastert

It will not be very realistic. If the Roman legion is going in Gaul, then it may be surrounded by areas of barbarian tribes, but the Romans are not afraid of this. Or the same thing happened with the European armies on other continents in the colonial period. So what I suggest: 1) If the troops are surrounded, then their forces are reduced by 70%, and they have only 30% of their normal strength. Therefore, if they are 10 times stronger, they will become 3 times stronger. 2) And the likelihood that they can move is only 50% - just to reduce their speed.

just the brush for all the ideas... just it.

ŁUKASZ!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Ye, Lucazs non-acting is strange. I dont understand him at all.

make agression 60%

"Dark reader" in google-webstore if you use chrome

He's not silent, 5 days ago he said that 3 years of work on AOC2 is enough

but i already doubt...(

Yea, if army is encircled and unconnected with its capital it should become almost useless

I want each country in the beginning of any scenario to have at least the minimum army in its borders, and the towers and castles should be in every border-province by default too.

No updates for almost 2 months...

It's really huge work that must be done to create a database of every city with every its name in different cultures. So it's not important. It's way better to improve diplomacy/waging war by AI, than such things)

1) - I meant capturing empty province. Now the minimum amount of army to take the province wdhout army is 10, i suggested that your army must be over 1% of civilian population of this hostile province. 3) Not movement points, but money 4) Playing as Germany i can invade Poland in 1939 and completly assimilate it till maybe 1941. Is that realistic? And i think more - assimilation should worsen the way all other countries treat you, at least democratic countries. 7) No, never met this in the game. But saw a lot of pockets of armies migrating through entire enemy's mainland. 8