Jump to content
Age of History Games
Lativ

Some suggestions

Recommended Posts

8 hours ago, Lativ said:

Hi Łukasz, I love the game so far, but there are some things I think should be added to make it even better :)

Also, happy New Year

Here are my propositons:

1. A new type of building: Hospital.

Many people (including me) want to have an option to cure diseases. I propose a solution as the new building: hospital. It would have 3 levels

lev 1- 30% of people in a province aren't touched by disease

lev 2- 50% of people in a province aren't touched by disease

lev 3- 85% of people in a province aren't touched by disease

2. A new diplomacy option: mediation

You send a peace offer to countries at war (not your allies or enemies). It's realistic and quite useful.

3. Recruting in conquered provinces

It is irritating when you attack some large country, you get rid of troops, and the nearest core province is far away. So I propose to make recruting in conquered provinces a thing, like Germany did in real life in USSR. BUT:

1. You could recruit only 25% of normal recruitable population

2. A cost of recruitment would be 1,5x higher

4. Stop with countries randomly insulting me

Or make it less often.

Some true story: I want to offer alliance to some civ. So I improve relations with them. In 2 turns they would agree. What happenned next? This country sent me an insult and everything went to shit. 

At least don't make my allies, vassals or countries with very good relations (75+ i'd say) insult me.

5. Make vassals more... vassalised

The only thing that makes vassals vassals in AoC2 is paying money to their lord and having an alliance with them. Today I played as Nazi Germany. I had Poland as vassal. After some turns it declared war to USRR and I had to save it, which costed me much effort. I'd love to see a mechanic that vassal first must ask its lord to do any diplomatic option. It would add realism as well.

What do you think?

 

I agree with all of this(except maybe the "medition" one since I feel like 1. It would make the game maybe a bit too easy and 2. I wouldn't exactly say Lukasz's goal with this game was to make it the most realistic grand-strategy game ever if you get my point). Escpecially with 4 and 5. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, Sonicsweden1 said:

I agree with all of this(except maybe the "medition" one since I feel like 1. It would make the game maybe a bit too easy and 2. I wouldn't exactly say Lukasz's goal with this game was to make it the most realistic grand-strategy game ever if you get my point). Escpecially with 4 and 5. 

Of course mediation wouldn't always be succesfull. I think it would only when both fighting countries would be in good relations with you, otherwise it wouldn't make much sense

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 minutes ago, Lativ said:

Of course mediation wouldn't always be succesfull. I think it would only when both fighting countries would be in good relations with you, otherwise it wouldn't make much sense

Alright, NOW I agree with everything.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

2. A new diplomacy option: mediation

You send a peace offer to countries at war (not your allies or enemies). It's realistic and quite useful.

The chances of success could related on how much more powerfull you are compared to them or they ask you to mediate because you are a great power.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Tell a friend

    Love Age of History Games? Tell a friend!

  • Posts

×
×
  • Create New...