Will the king of the state come to the wood?

[isa yorulmaz 15]

I think that if we are going to participate in wars, not only the commanders but also the head of the state should be at the head of the army, for example, there are 2 armies and the head of the first army should be the head of the state or the king.

[Ares I of Congo 88]

I hope so

[Денис Живков 753]

On 3/6/2024 at 3:33 PM, isa yorulmaz said:

I think that if we are going to participate in wars, not only the commanders but also the head of the state should be at the head of the army, for example, there are 2 armies and the head of the first army should be the head of the state or the king.

Yes, it definitely has to be
it boosts the morale of the troops when the king participates with the soldiers. But there must be something in contrast.
For example, a ruler can be killed during a war, as well as a thousand of the same soldiers.

• the ruler can be captured, and you never know what else they can do to him, especially if the ruler is a woman.)))

[qxz 622]

yeah could be cool

[muhoaga 129]

On 06.03.2024 at 15:33, isa yorulmaz said:

Bence savaşlara katılacaksak ordunun başında sadece komutanlar değil devlet başkanı da olmalı, mesela 2 ordu var ve ilk ordunun başı da baş olmalı devletin veya kralın.

Yes, I also think it would be very nice if when the king or the leader of the country takes command of the army, the morale of the army and the people could rise and have various effects. In fact, in the game, if there is an option to choose an heir before the king dies, they could also take command of the army and participate in wars.

 

If the king dies in battle, there could be a significant drop in morale, along with a decrease of around 30% in war points, which would be very interesting.

 

And if there are heirs in the game with bad characteristics, we could send them to the front lines in battle, increasing the likelihood of their death, or use them to eliminate internal rivals, adding a lot of color to the game.

[Ares I of Congo 88]

16 hours ago, Денис Живков said:

Yes, it definitely has to be
it boosts the morale of the troops when the king participates with the soldiers. But there must be something in contrast.
For example, a ruler can be killed during a war, as well as a thousand of the same soldiers.

• the ruler can be captured, and you never know what else they can do to him, especially if the ruler is a woman.)))

Thats what im saying