Emer 11 Posted January 8, 2024 i think it should cost more the farther back you get, that way you dont have nukes in 1834 or smth also maybe like uranium deposits that u need to own to get nukes maybe small and big nukes? maybe the actual province is inhabitable and the provinces around have buildings destroyed just some ideas seedzior 1 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jimmy Wong 0 Posted January 8, 2024 If there's nuke in the game, everything will change it looks like the 3rd game is mainly about ancient wars when numbers is the most important factor of war, to defeat countrys you must fight. If players nuke, why would you fight? Just nuke when things went south like how real life is, lose the whole point of this game. I say it's a good idea IF there's diplomatic and event in the game but that need a lot of works for the dev. Just saying, game balanced etc Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
thecarvalhogamer 27 Posted January 8, 2024 In the Age of History III video, over there in the research tree, you can see the Manhattan Project, so it will probably be added to the game. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
bizacjum 219 Posted January 8, 2024 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
seedzior 0 Posted January 8, 2024 Yeah, that will be good idea Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
