Capitulations

[null 32]

I propose to return the concept of the first part. When your capital is captured, you capitulate. Thus, the conquests will become easier. So the capital and its location will become more significant.

[Luigiss Cornelious 14]

I like your idea. I don't know about complete capitulation, but maybe some disadvantages can be added so that your army is less effective or independence movements gain momentum.

[qxz 622]

No need for capitulation when there is a warscore system

[Wayne23lololh 1,645]

And there is an event for capitulation. Suggested by Xox.

[Thefernofrommars 86]

Capitulations should only be enabled as late-game bonus content (1900+)

[Outlawexperience 338]

It doesn't make sense for an entire civ to capitulate for losing 1 province, and there is ticking warscore so there's no need for it

If you want capitulation/surrendering Nations historically accurate for example France capitulation when losing Paris in ww2 then you can make an event for it

[Thefernofrommars 86]

32 minutes ago, Outlawexperience said:

It doesn't make sense for an entire civ to capitulate for losing 1 province, and there is ticking warscore so there's no need for it

If you want capitulation/surrendering Nations historically accurate for example France capitulation when losing Paris in ww2 then you can make an event for it

If there are tickers then I don't see the point of capitulation.