Protests and suppression

[Das Moss Man 486]

Hello mein people today we're gonna talk about protesting and government  suppression (YAY). I also have another post about leader animosity, with ties into this one link. Now let's start, 

Protesting: 

Protesting would be a lesser version of rebelling, cause rebelling is dangerous and revolutions are expensive. Now on to what triggers a protest, war, laws, and joy. Let's say you pass a law that is agianst your ideology [example: revoking freedom of speech in a democratic country] or war if your support is really low [let's say 20%]. Or if your civ is really unhappy. There will be two types of protests. Peacful, and Violent protest. 

Violent protests would, decrease stability, decrease happiness, slightly increased revolutionary risk.(@Łukasz Jakowski translation:) [-X% stability] [-X% happiness] [+X% revolutionary risk]

Peaceful protests would, ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

[DETOUR] The notifications for the peacful and violent protest would be different. Peacful would be white, and violent would be red (of course)

[DETOUR] Rebels should be inventiveness not to rebel when divisions are near by. 

Government suppression:

15, April, 1989. China 

Your people are protesting, they are MAD. They might even rebel, a REVO-LUTION even? You don't wanna fall to the same fate those leaders before you. So you send in the arm[❗️❗️🇨🇳WARNING THIS HAS BEEN CENCORSED BY THE GLORIUS CCP FOR YOUR SAFETY 🇨🇳❗️❗️] Anyways government suppression. When a protest pops up you have three options. 

Meet their demands [Example: stop a war]

Ignore them

Or send in the army

The two others are self explanatory,  but I will go into this into a bit more detail. If you decide to send the army after the protesters. This would, decrease  your stability, increase revolutionary risk, decrease happiness, and increase leader animosity. (@Łukasz Jakowski translation:) [-X% stability] [-X% happiness] [+X% revolutionary risk] [+X% leader animosity] Which could spiral into a death cycle, leading to REVO-LUTION.

That is the end I hope you found it interesting, and make sure to: Give da critism :-Þ

[Note: I felt a little burnt out and sluggish while writing this so I'm sorry if this topic is lackluster]

[Das Moss Man 486]

@Łukasz Jakowski thoughts 

Edited July 9, 2024 by Das Moss Man

[Das Moss Man 486]

This could be a great opportunity for more event options in aoh3. Alot of my ideas are based on making historical stuff more possible. And this I feel would be a great opportunity for another event option 🙂

[Das Moss Man 486]

1 hour ago, Das Moss Man said:

@Łukasz Jakowski thoughts 

?*

[Das Moss Man 486]

A warship to keep your guys attention 

 

 

 

[@OwnM3Z0 ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)]

[AmericanLiberia 74]

Instead of sending the army, could just be like "repression", or some like that. Like the police or some like that do the job. Because in other way I imagine like you have to send divisions/battalions manually and that could be annoying 😛

[Das Moss Man 486]

10 hours ago, AmericanLiberia said:

Instead of sending the army, could just be like "repression", or some like that. Like the police or some like that do the job. Because in other way I imagine like you have to send divisions/battalions manually and that could be annoying 😛

This could be an opportunity for police but I don't think it would fit

[Das Moss Man 486]

9 minutes ago, Das Moss Man said:

This could be an opportunity for police but I don't think it would fit

And it's not really needed

[OwnM3Z0 1,101]

10 hours ago, Das Moss Man said:

A warship to keep your guys attention 

 

 

 

[@OwnM3Z0 ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)]

hmm boaet

2 minutes ago, Das Moss Man said:

And it's not really needed

i think people need to remember that the game is still heavily in alpha, just because we arent getting navy or frontlines or release doesnt mean lukasz wont get around to them in future updates... chillax, take it easy and enjoy the ride 

[Das Moss Man 486]

2 minutes ago, OwnM3Z0 said:

hmm boaet

i think people need to remember that the game is still heavily in alpha, just because we arent getting navy or frontlines or release doesnt mean lukasz wont get around to them in future updates... chillax, take it easy and enjoy the ride 

SEA PEOPLES JUMPSCARE

2 minutes ago, OwnM3Z0 said:

hmm boaet

i think people need to remember that the game is still heavily in alpha, just because we arent getting navy or frontlines or release doesnt mean lukasz wont get around to them in future updates... chillax, take it easy and enjoy the ride 

Yeah, maybe he has a secret future update backlog if user ideas

[Das Moss Man 486]

Link to home page here

[Das Moss Man 486]

Tsar Nikolai 

Edited July 10, 2024 by Das Moss Man

[Das Moss Man 486]

On 7/9/2024 at 5:13 PM, Das Moss Man said:

decrease stability, decrease happiness, slightly increased revolutionary risk.(@Łukasz Jakowski translation:) [-X% stability] [-X% happiness] [+X% revolutionary risk]

Additionally if you let it go on for long enough they could start destroying buildings

[Naval 212]

this topic has big dick energy

[AmericanLiberia 74]

I also don't think it, but I trow the idea, who knows.

On 7/10/2024 at 7:24 AM, Das Moss Man said:

This could be an opportunity for police but I don't think it would fit

 

[New port 13]

Good day. I wondered what could happen after:

Ignored protest: The risk of revolution will increase.

Fulfillment of requirements: Stability, happiness will increase and the risk of revolution will decrease.

Suppression of protest: Stability and happiness will decrease, but the risk of revolution will also decrease.

 

A small protest should be a harbinger of a big one, that is, you should stop the protest while it is still small. Of course, a large protest should lead to a revolution.

 

I said everything that came to mind. I knew that I told something what wars told above. I hope Lukasz will add it. That' s great idea.