Age of History 3 - Peace treaty ideas

[LegendMihai 10]

It would be super useful to have an option to give territories to an allied or vassal country during the peace treaty.
For example, if I have allies / neutral vassals who have not participated in the war, I can decide which provinces to give them if I want to do that.
If I have an allied or vassal country that actively contributed to the war, it would be interesting for the allied country to automatically choose its desired territories and possibly to have the dispute over them to negotiate who gets what territory, while the vassal, even if he fought, should not be able to ask for territory unless you give him what you want if you want,

[dandy911rbk 5]

It seems to me that it would not be a bad idea to add a “Territory Control” function. This would mean that the territories you have chosen will not be captured, but will generate income in terms of resources, money, etc.

[haibao 0]

You can ask the defeated country not to have some technologies and laws through the war score, but the treaty with a national strength below a certain level willbe invalid

[mikedadumy 3]

Two words, Demilitarized zones, this will be amazing if it actually gets added. it will take war score a bit more than occupying territories.

Edited May 10, 2024 by mikedadumy
forgot to mention warscore

[LemonAid 4]

Plundering can worsen your war points

[Naval 212]

57 minutes ago, LemonAid said:

Plundering can worsen your war points

vice versa 

[Kaiser Turkish 1]

If a country is annexed in war we should be able to change its religion 

Edited May 21, 2024 by Kaiser Turkish

[Kaiser Turkish 1]

On 28.02.2024 at 16:36, JoJ_A said:

-"Bence barış antlaşması için, toprak büyüklüğünüz daha küçük olsa bile, eğer ulus sizinkinden çok daha büyükse, bir ulusun tamamen ilhak edilmesini sağlayabilirsiniz"

-"Mağlup olan milletin veya milletlerin ordusunun sınırlandırılmasını talep etmenin bir yolu olsun . "

I agree with the idea of annexation, but I disagree with the idea of limiting the army
can make the game easier.

[mrx 49]

Could you add a requirement to demilitarize the area. And you can also add a requirement to dismantle the fortress \ military fort.
This has been a fairly common occurrence in history.

[Asssssssbigone 9]

On 2/28/2024 at 10:31 PM, Outlawexperience said:

Here are my ideas for possible new demands in the peace deal:

-If the enemy Civilization is in an alliance, then there can be a demand to remove it from their alliance, but if the winner Civilization is in an alliance, then it could force the loser civilization to join their alliance

 

-Demilitarization, we can choose how much we demilitarize an enemy Civilization by either raising their military upkeep if they pass the limit of units they shouldn't pass, this should depend on the warscore: for example if you have a low warscore the limit isn't harsh but if is it high then the limit is very harsh

 

-War Reparations: The time and number of money to pay for war reparations should also depend on warscore you have: if you have a low warscore, then the enemy civilization must pay a quick and small amount of gold, if you have a high warscore then the enemy civilization will pay a huge amount of gold for a long time

 

Here are my ideas for peace deal demands, I hope you read them and possibly add them 🙏

A disarmament treaty too, for example if you conquer a civilization you can force to not create any army units for a certain time period (they can also violate it to make things spicy and we can know this through our spy network in the conquered civilization)

[New port 13]

I think it will be fine.

Edited July 11, 2024 by New port

[New port 13]

When you you propose the terms of a peace treaty with an ally, he should also comment on it and then there should be a much greater chance that he will accept it. And vassal accept it always.

[New port 13]

Yes, and you should ask the defeated state to demilitarize an area. Like Ottoman empire and Germany.

[New port 13]

I don't know where to put it, so I'll put it here:

States under your control should be divided into vassals, colonies, protectorates...

This is important to see how much control you have over your subordinate states.

And there should be more chance of rebellion, so it would be important to make your colonies and not own everything in your empire. 

That' s all.

[Yiğit türk 0]

 

Çok fazla toprak alırsak bize karşı bir koalisyon kurulmalı

If we take too much land, a coalition must be formed against us

[Corgi X 25]

nazwy traktatów

Kiedy podpisujesz traktat pokojowy powinna być opcja wybrania miasta, w którym będzie on podpisany czyli kiedy podpiszesz traktat  np w Wiedniu będzie się nazywał traktat wiedeński 

[EuroballProductions 20]

Maybe could lords take their puppets' and colonies' war points?

[user73739 1]

On 28.02.2024 at 17:23, Łukasz Jakowski said:

Bu başlık altında barış antlaşması için fikirlerinizi yazabilirsiniz.

 

Şöyle olabilir:
Savaş liderinin %100 savaş puanı olması ve her türlü talebi yapabilmesi gerekir.

Bir barış antlaşmasında ilhak edilebilecek eyalet sayısının bir sınırı olacak.
Bu, savaştığı medeniyete kıyasla medeniyetin büyüklüğüne bağlı olacak.

 

Eğer bir medeniyetin savaş yorgunluğu yüksekse, savaş skoru daha hızlı artacaktır.

Savaşın kazanan tarafı için savaş skoru artacaktır.

 

 

 

 

 

The right of the victorious state to open a consulate in the capital of the rival state. This consulate can give us information about the country, the buildings built, the amount of the army produced and the monthly income of the country.

If a rival state declares war on us, the consulate will automatically close. Building a consulate is possible with 50% war points.

[Mister_Shiza 1]

It would be cool if the result of a peace treaty depended on the ideology of the winner.

The Fascists Seize Everything, the Democrats take back their former territories and liberate countries on the condition that they are in their alliance, and the Communists would create Vassals. Also, if a Nazi makes a country a vassal, then "Reichskommissirat" is added to the name of the vassal, and the flag is replaced with the Flag of the Country that controls this vassal.

[khang 0]

Here are some common types of peace treaties:

1. Comprehensive peace treaty

Characteristics: This is the most comprehensive type of treaty, resolving all issues related to conflict, from ending wars, establishing borders, to resolving territorial disputes, war compensation, and land reconstruction. water.

For example: The Treaty of Versailles ended World War I.

2. Armistice

Characteristics: Is a temporary agreement to ceasefire and facilitate comprehensive peace negotiations. Armistices are usually time-limited and can be extended.

For example: The armistice at Panmunjom ended the Korean War.

3. Reconciliation treaty

Characteristics: Aims to rebuild diplomatic relations and cooperation between countries after conflict. This treaty often includes provisions on normalization of relations, economic cooperation, cultural and other areas.

Example: Elysée Treaty between France and Germany.

4. Security guarantee treaty

Characteristics: Participating parties pledge not to use force against each other and to jointly ensure peace and stability in the region.

For example: North Atlantic Treaty (NATO).

5. Demilitarization treaty

Characteristics: Participating parties agree not to deploy military forces or nuclear weapons in a given area.

Example: Demilitarized zone between North and South Korea.

Important elements in a peace treaty:

Ending fighting: This is the main goal of every peace treaty.

Addressing the root causes of conflict: The treaty should address the underlying issues that caused the conflict to prevent it from recurring.

Establish monitoring and enforcement mechanisms: The treaty should have mechanisms to monitor the implementation of provisions and resolve disputes that may arise.

Building trust: Parties need to build mutual trust to ensure the long-term success of the treaty.

Challenges in achieving and maintaining peace:

Differences in interests: Participating parties often have opposing interests, making it difficult to find a common solution.

Pressure from third parties: Other countries could intervene in the peace process, causing further complications.

Change in political situation: Domestic or international political situation may change, affecting the implementation of the treaty.