Jump to content
Age of History 3
Wayne23lololh

Maritime boundaries

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

Hi,  I suggest adding maritime boundaries, to have other utilities than just to move. It could bring economic (ressource) bonus, and to prevent border gore. So when we click in a sea province, we will see their claimants. 

The possession of sea grants economic benefit in ressources like fish, coral, algae and soil could be taken, for modern time (1880’s), sea like monuments provides tourism, which some countries get rich by, so prestige bonus. Some strategic sea provinces could also bring extra bonuses for trade like straight.  

To prevent border gore, civilizations’ armies can’t go to sea provinces who don't “belong” to them. So Tunis can’t declare war on Venice, if other countries didn’t give Tunis access to the Sea to reach his opponent. 

If a country sent an army in a sea province who don't belong to them without autorisation, relations between them could deteriorate, or even be a cause for a war.  

A sea province could have several claimants for scenarios like 1444, in which many countries had access to the same sea province. Is it possible to remove claimants to X years by peace treaty, and maybe if a vassal could have access to the sea.

Could be modifiable and turned off.

eez.thumb.jpg.1c2b8327c58801cd60be3e18a5751ef8.jpg

Edited by Wayne23lololh

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Wayne23lololh said:

Hi,  I suggest adding maritime boundaries, to have other utilities than just to move. It could bring economic (ressource) bonus, and to prevent border gore. So when we click in a sea province, we will see their claimants. 

The possession of sea grants economic benefit in ressources like fish, coral, algae and soil could be taken, for modern time (1880’s), sea like monuments provides tourism, which some countries get rich by, so prestige bonus. Some strategic sea provinces could also bring extra bonuses for trade like straight.  

To prevent border gore, civilizations’ armies can’t go to sea provinces who don't “belong” to them. So Tunis can’t declare war on Venice, if other countries didn’t give Tunis access to the Sea to reach his opponent. 

If a country sent an army in a sea province who don't belong to them without autorisation, relations between them could deteriorate, or even be a cause for a war.  

A sea province could have several claimants for scenarios like 1444, in which many countries had access to the same sea province. Is it possible to remove claimants to X years by peace treaty, and maybe if a vassal could have access to the sea.

Could be modifiable and turned off.

eez.thumb.jpg.318ec4e8ed4db34bc78425a85e82dd86.jpg

Now that's a brilliant idea, even cod wars can be implemented that way. It might be complicated, but I like the concept itself 👍

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

On 4/11/2024 at 1:33 PM, Wayne23lololh said:

Hi,  I suggest adding maritime boundaries, to have other utilities than just to move. It could bring economic (ressource) bonus, and to prevent border gore. So when we click in a sea province, we will see their claimants. 

The possession of sea grants economic benefit in ressources like fish, coral, algae and soil could be taken, for modern time (1880’s), sea like monuments provides tourism, which some countries get rich by, so prestige bonus. Some strategic sea provinces could also bring extra bonuses for trade like straight.  

To prevent border gore, civilizations’ armies can’t go to sea provinces who don't “belong” to them. So Tunis can’t declare war on Venice, if other countries didn’t give Tunis access to the Sea to reach his opponent. 

If a country sent an army in a sea province who don't belong to them without autorisation, relations between them could deteriorate, or even be a cause for a war.  

A sea province could have several claimants for scenarios like 1444, in which many countries had access to the same sea province. Is it possible to remove claimants to X years by peace treaty, and maybe if a vassal could have access to the sea.

Could be modifiable and turned off.

eez.thumb.jpg.318ec4e8ed4db34bc78425a85e82dd86.jpg

I loved the idea

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Also, regions could have some usefulness, we can allow only civilization to adopt colonial laws located in these regions : Iberia, British Isles, France, Benelux, Germany... 

It could be edited, and we can also set the economy, wars probability (put 0% for Switzerland), etc...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Wayne23lololh said:

Good question !

Since Łukasz himself said that there will be different tech tree, all civilizations located in Asia (capital), could not adopt colonial laws. This could be disabled, to make some alternate scenarios.

When did Lukasz say that? 

I do not think that is the case

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted (edited)
5 hours ago, qxz said:

Yeah thought so

I am sincerely sorry ! I didn't sea right. So te only option is the region thing.

You can remove the quote, I delete the previous comment (I don't want to spread misinformation 😓 )

Edited by Wayne23lololh

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, OwnM3Z0 said:

hm, but what will happen when in war? will those be transferred automatically or through points? 

There could be 2 options. The first one is to have access to one or several enemy's sea provinces, so sharing with it, and the second one is to exclude the enemy the access of his sea province. This could be automatic only the enemy becomes a landlocked country.

Example Bosnia lose it's coastline, Bosnia would automatically lose access to the sea by Croatia.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Wayne23lololh said:

There could be 2 options. The first one is to have access to one or several enemy's sea provinces, so sharing with it, and the second one is to exclude the enemy the access of his sea province. This could be automatic only the enemy becomes a landlocked country.

Example Bosnia lose it's coastline, Bosnia would automatically lose access to the sea by Croatia.

i disagree, i think you shouldn't be able to landlock countries unless you have the point's to take their sea borders also to balance things, i also think that sea borders should be taken by points in peace treaties which would be interesting, BUT at the same time, if you win a decisive victory you don't have to spend points on maritime provinces, you just have to take the shore provinces or annex all the land

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

30 minutes ago, Wayne23lololh said:

You're right, but I mean that when a country becomes landlocked, logically, it can't have sea access. Maybe make sea provinces connected with coastal provinces ?

that wouldn't make sense for the atlantic and pacific oceans + the entire purpose of this is to prevent colonial bordergore which would be removed since u won't have any shores when you start colonizing 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, OwnM3Z0 said:

that wouldn't make sense for the atlantic and pacific oceans + the entire purpose of this is to prevent colonial bordergore which would be removed since u won't have any shores when you start colonizing 

First of all, I previously said that Atlantic and Pacific oceans would be neutral, so every country which possess a sea province in these sea can bypass it. 

Secondly, the purpose in not only to avoid colonial border gore, it's to make trade more realistic, when we pass trough another country sea province. Why would Russian ships trade with Germany, by pass to Nordic sea ? Russia must have Norway's permission, to travel ships. Norway will earn money from Russian and Germany. (or just Russia)

It will also bring a high risk for war, when a country violate without permission another country's sea territory. Turkey declare war on Egypt, it must have the permission of Greece or Cyprus to be able to pass by their area. 

And it will bring sea resources like crabs, fish and will work like land resource.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

On 4/11/2024 at 5:33 PM, Wayne23lololh said:

Hi,  I suggest adding maritime boundaries, to have other utilities than just to move. It could bring economic (ressource) bonus, and to prevent border gore. So when we click in a sea province, we will see their claimants. 

The possession of sea grants economic benefit in ressources like fish, coral, algae and soil could be taken, for modern time (1880’s), sea like monuments provides tourism, which some countries get rich by, so prestige bonus. Some strategic sea provinces could also bring extra bonuses for trade like straight.  

To prevent border gore, civilizations’ armies can’t go to sea provinces who don't “belong” to them. So Tunis can’t declare war on Venice, if other countries didn’t give Tunis access to the Sea to reach his opponent. 

If a country sent an army in a sea province who don't belong to them without autorisation, relations between them could deteriorate, or even be a cause for a war.  

A sea province could have several claimants for scenarios like 1444, in which many countries had access to the same sea province. Is it possible to remove claimants to X years by peace treaty, and maybe if a vassal could have access to the sea.

Could be modifiable and turned off.

eez.thumb.jpg.1c2b8327c58801cd60be3e18a5751ef8.jpg

Interesting idea 👍 I think for it to be well implemented a lot more sea provinces need to be added 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Our picks

    • Age of History 3 - October 23rd, 2024 - Official release date
      Age of History 3 - Official release date

       

      Steam: October 23rd, 2024

      Android: When it's ready

      iOS: When it's ready

      Epic: When it's ready

       
    • Campaign: Small Scenarios
      In this topic, share your ideas for Campaign scenarios.

      These scenarios focus on a small part of the map, with the rest designated as wasteland.

       

      For example, a scenario of the Reconquista in 1054, where gameplay takes place only on the Iberian Peninsula.

      What are your ideas for small historical scenarios?

       


       
    • Events - Common events for every civilization in the game
      Hi,
      in this topic, I am interested in your ideas for events that can happen for every Civilization in the game.
      I'm also interested in Missions for every Civilization.

      Here is some example, have more than 10k army, have more than 5000 gold, build 10 buildings, recruit an Advisor, increase tax efficiency 20 times, be largest  producer of some resource in the world, unlock 5 Civilization legacies etc.
      • 196 replies
    • First preview of the Alpha version of Age of History 3
      First preview of the Alpha version of Age of History 3, YouTube.
      Release date: When it's ready 😛 Subscribe for more!



       





       
    • Land units - Ideas AoH3
      AoH3 will have different types of land units.

      In this topic we will write ideas for new land units. 

       

      So the AoH 3 will have new battle system.


      Representation of the battlefield in the game.


      Land units will be grouped into 3 types. Each unit will have a different recruitment cost, attack, defense, movement speed and upkeep.

      Groups determine the placement of units on the battlefield.


       

      Each unit can be unlocked by researching technology and then upgraded.

       

      Here is the current list of units with upgrades:

      First line:

      Warrior -> Light Footmen -> Heavy Infantry -> Infantry -> Line Infantry -> Modern Infantry

      Hoplites -> Spearmen -> Pikeman -> Elite Pikeman -> Musketeer -> Riflemen -> Mechanized Infantry -> Modern Mechanized Infantry

      First line side:

      Horseman -> Elite Horseman -> Cavalry -> Tank -> Modern Tank

      Second line:

      Archer -> Bowmen -> Crossbowman -> Elite Crossbowman

      Canon -> Field Cannon -> Artillery -> Modern Artillery

      Early Airplane -> Airplane -> Modern Airplane

       

      This is a very early version, so maybe something should be changed?

      Or maybe an idea for a new type of unit with upgrades? I'm waiting for your suggestions.

       
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. Age of History Games