Murat1480 8 Posted June 1, 2024 (edited) Please add ethnic group system for Age of Histroy 3 and add ethnicities to civilizations, for example Slavic Germanic and Latin, civilizations with the same ethnicity may have better relations with each other while civilizations with different ethnicities may have colder relations with each other and in assimilation, civilizations with the same ethnicity may be easier to assimilate while civilizations with a different ethnicity may be more difficult to assimilate. Adding ethnicities has many more benefits, for example civilizations of the same ethnicity can more easily develop relationships and alliances with each other. If you add this feature, the Game can be more specific and detailed. I hope you add this feature. I wish you a healthy life! Edited June 9, 2024 by Murat1480 Mirolit, stoomer2021, Wayne23lololh and 2 others 4 1 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wayne23lololh 1,645 Posted June 1, 2024 You can see a topic about this here Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
OwnM3Z0 1,101 Posted June 1, 2024 53 minutes ago, Wayne23lololh said: You can see a topic about this here bruh whose dogwater take was it that ottomans had ''arab persian'' culture for most their history 💀 Wayne23lololh, Lim10, Денис Живков and 1 other 4 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wayne23lololh 1,645 Posted June 1, 2024 4 hours ago, OwnM3Z0 said: bruh whose dogwater take was it that ottomans had ''arab persian'' culture for most their history 💀 I dont know, but it was the last reply, it's not like I wanted to change this ! 😅 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
OwnM3Z0 1,101 Posted June 1, 2024 2 minutes ago, Wayne23lololh said: I dont know, but it was the last reply, it's not like I wanted to change this ! 😅 i know its no problem im just joking, btw if u want check out my meme in #offtopic Wayne23lololh 1 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
null 32 Posted June 1, 2024 4 hours ago, OwnM3Z0 said: bruh whose dogwater take was it that ottomans had ''arab persian'' culture for most their history Dude, 90% of ottoman language words were Arabic and Persian Lim10 1 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
OwnM3Z0 1,101 Posted June 1, 2024 13 minutes ago, null said: Dude, 90% of ottoman language words were Arabic and Persian farsi uses arabic world IRAN HAS ARABIC AS CULTURE CONFIRMED?!!! Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
null 32 Posted June 1, 2024 1 minute ago, OwnM3Z0 said: farsi uses arabic world IRAN HAS ARABIC AS CULTURE CONFIRMED?!! Nope, Iranians use their own alphabet, which is similar to Arabic. OwnM3Z0 1 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
OwnM3Z0 1,101 Posted June 1, 2024 3 minutes ago, null said: Nope, Iranians use their own alphabet, which is similar to Arabic. bruh i speak arabic the farsi alphabet is literally the same, the only difference is the words, i have tried to read articles in farsi and the only difference was the writing, felt like i was reading hieroglyphics Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
null 32 Posted June 1, 2024 2 minutes ago, OwnM3Z0 said: bruh i speak arabic the farsi alphabet is literally the same, the only difference is the words, i have tried to read articles in farsi and the only difference was the writing, felt like i was reading hieroglyphics This does not change the fact that the Ottoman culture was formed mainly from Arab and Persian elements. It became Turkish only after the Young Turk Revolution, or even under Ataturk (which literally translates as the father of the Turks) Lim10 and OwnM3Z0 2 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
null 32 Posted June 1, 2024 13 minutes ago, OwnM3Z0 said: bruh i speak arabic the farsi alphabet is literally the same, the only difference is the words, i have tried to read articles in farsi and the only difference was the writing, felt like i was reading hieroglyphics I bet you don’t know that Constantinople became Istanbul only in 1930 OwnM3Z0 1 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
OwnM3Z0 1,101 Posted June 1, 2024 22 minutes ago, null said: I bet you don’t know that Constantinople became Istanbul only in 1930 what does that even- where did that come from bruh i know that shi, it was called constantiyyie or asatana, stop talking to people with this sense of superiority, your spending your saturday night on some random indie game forum, humble down a notch Lim10 1 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
OwnM3Z0 1,101 Posted June 1, 2024 28 minutes ago, null said: This does not change the fact that the Ottoman culture was formed mainly from Arab and Persian elements. It became Turkish only after the Young Turk Revolution, or even under Ataturk (which literally translates as the father of the Turks) to convince me that the ottoman empire did not have a turkish culture until 1908 INCLUDING WHEN THEY WERE A SMALL BEYLIK, your out of your damn mind, just because the ottoman turkish used arabic words doesn't mean they had arab culture, the ottoman fez, the style of governance, the succession, the language, the architecture all have their own unique culture to them, to say otherwise is a great disservice to the contributions of the ottomans and turks in general, if this is some turkish secular nationalist pseudo logic then it turned on itself and instead of glorifying your race like little tribal idiots you guys now disqualified it of all of it's greatest achievements Lim10 1 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
null 32 Posted June 1, 2024 27 minutes ago, OwnM3Z0 said: what does that even- where did that come from bruh i know that shi, it was called constantiyyie or asatana, stop talking to people with this sense of superiority, your spending your saturday night on some random indie game forum, humble down a notch I just mentioned a few historical facts, what's wrong with that? P.S. It was called Konstantiniyye which is Arabic form of Constantinople. Lim10 1 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
null 32 Posted June 1, 2024 48 minutes ago, OwnM3Z0 said: to convince me that the ottoman empire did not have a turkish culture until 1908 INCLUDING WHEN THEY WERE A SMALL BEYLIK, your out of your damn mind, just because the ottoman turkish used arabic words doesn't mean they had arab culture, the ottoman fez, the style of governance, the succession, the language, the architecture all have their own unique culture to them, to say otherwise is a great disservice to the contributions of the ottomans and turks in general, if this is some turkish secular nationalist pseudo logic then it turned on itself and instead of glorifying your race like little tribal idiots you guys now disqualified it of all of it's greatest achievements Being a small beylik, the Ottomans were already strongly influenced by the Persian culture. Because they came to Asia Minor through Persia. Islam was also accepted by Ottomans from the Persians, initially being pagans. Ottoman fez, style of governance, succession, and language were also mostly Arabian and Persian. Turk element was in minority, until the rise of Turk national idea. The Ottomans didn't even call themselves Turks until the 20th century. It was a kind of insult to them. Lim10 1 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
OwnM3Z0 1,101 Posted June 1, 2024 19 minutes ago, null said: Being a small beylik, the Ottomans were already strongly influenced by the Persian culture. Because they came to Asia Minor through Persia. Islam was also accepted by Ottomans from the Persians, initially being pagans. Ottoman fez, style of governance, succession, and language were also mostly Arabian and Persian. Turk element was in minority, until the rise of Turk national idea. The Ottomans didn't even call themselves Turks until the 20th century. It was a kind of insult to them. not true 💀 where even is the proof for any of this Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
OwnM3Z0 1,101 Posted June 1, 2024 21 minutes ago, null said: I just mentioned a few historical facts, what's wrong with that? P.S. It was called Konstantiniyye which is Arabic form of Constantinople. you just assumed that i probably dont know a fact that has nothing to do with the subject, and asatana was what it was called in arabic historical texts around the napoleonic invasion of egypt, both are right, you just act like you know it all Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
null 32 Posted June 1, 2024 11 minutes ago, OwnM3Z0 said: not true 💀 where even is the proof for any of this Dude, just learn history. The Ottoman beylik itself in the 14 century was just a possession of the Ottoman dynasty, without reference to any culture. However, Persian culture and Islam allowed the Ottomans to take advantage of all the achievements of islamic civilisation. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
null 32 Posted June 1, 2024 (edited) 33 minutes ago, OwnM3Z0 said: you just assumed that i probably dont know a fact that has nothing to do with the subject, and asatana was what it was called in arabic historical texts around the napoleonic invasion of egypt, both are right, you just act like you know it all Konstantiniyye is ARABIC name of the Ottoman capital, which it has been called throughout the history of the empire. Is this has nothing with the subject? Edited June 1, 2024 by null Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
OwnM3Z0 1,101 Posted June 1, 2024 Just now, null said: Konstantiniyye is Arabic name of the Ottoman capital, which it has been called throughout the history of the empire. both are correct as i said, it's called asatana in the textbooks in our schools as it was called that by some historians at the time of the british invasion of egypt Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
null 32 Posted June 1, 2024 4 minutes ago, OwnM3Z0 said: both are correct as i said, it's called asatana in the textbooks in our schools as it was called that by some historians at the time of the british invasion of egypt So nothing wrong with ARABIC name of capital? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
null 32 Posted June 1, 2024 2 hours ago, OwnM3Z0 said: to convince me that the ottoman empire did not have a turkish culture until 1908 INCLUDING WHEN THEY WERE A SMALL BEYLIK, your out of your damn mind, just because the ottoman turkish used arabic words doesn't mean they had arab culture, the ottoman fez, the style of governance, the succession, the language, the architecture all have their own unique culture to them, to say otherwise is a great disservice to the contributions of the ottomans and turks in general, if this is some turkish secular nationalist pseudo logic then it turned on itself and instead of glorifying your race like little tribal idiots you guys now disqualified it of all of it's greatest achievements Actually, it is wrong to start Ottoman history from small beylik in Anatolia. Because Ottomans were succeders of the Roman empire. Mehmed II after conquest of Constantinople, which means expulsion of the Venetians from there, assumed the title of Kayser i Rum. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mirolit 185 Posted June 3, 2024 It would be logical to simply combine cultures into groups and supergroups, and the stronger the bond (culture >group > supergroup), the greater the bonuses (accelerated assimilation, cheaper peace making, a bonus to improving relationships, etc.) Денис Живков 1 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...