Bordergore

[Mr.Hitler 32]

bordergore is bad

[Eastert 12]

Yeah! It must be much more expensive to maintain the far territories than closer, so countries wichh have normal borders will have better economic. So the bordergore-countries will not survive very long

Edited February 4, 2019 by Eastert

[PETER 53]

On 2/4/2019 at 4:13 AM, Eastert said:

Yeah! It must be much more expensive to maintain the far territories than closer, so countries wichh have normal borders will have better economic. So the bordergore-countries will not survive very long

Human players aren't the cause of bordergore.  The AI itself would have to change.

[Eastert 12]

On 2/6/2019 at 8:50 PM, PETER said:

Human players aren't the cause of bordergore.  The AI itself would have to change.

And the AI-countries themselves will prevail having normal borders cuz of better economic

[Ramiro007 499]

On 2/4/2019 at 6:13 AM, Eastert said:

Yeah! It must be much more expensive to maintain the far territories than closer, so countries wichh have normal borders will have better economic. So the bordergore-countries will not survive very long

Well thought! this should be added in the game

[PETER 53]

11 hours ago, Eastert said:

And the AI-countries themselves will prevail having normal borders cuz of better economic

AI cannot come to conclusions like we can.  Who is to say they want economic success?  Because they build workshops?  No.  They want to build workshops.  That is how they were programmed.

[Mr.Hitler 32]

On 2/4/2019 at 2:13 AM, Eastert said:

Yeah! It must be much more expensive to maintain the far territories than closer, so countries wichh have normal borders will have better economic. So the bordergore-countries will not survive very long

Yeah that's a very good idea !

[Eastert 12]

12 hours ago, PETER said:

AI cannot come to conclusions like we can.  Who is to say they want economic success?  Because they build workshops?  No.  They want to build workshops.  That is how they were programmed.

I mean that bad economic will not let them wage war succesfully enough to defeat normal countries

Edited February 9, 2019 by Eastert

[Guest Doctor Morpheus]

I guess adding more unrest to further out provinces work, although it’d have to definitely depend on development, lest we see Siberian revolts in Russia. Additionally, i think that adding parameters to the A.Is objective will help (e.g if it is a German state, it will focus it’s wars on German provinces, France will focus on French and Italian and Belgian provinces, etc.) That could help deal with border gore, although it would probably leech some fun out of the ai game as it will reduce randomness and you may see less rising powers. There isn’t a good way to deal with this when he is a lone developer; the best way is probably to do the first idea mentioned but dependant on development and also some provinces having special modifiers. Anyways, that’s my twenty cents, bye.

[PETER 53]

On 2/9/2019 at 2:03 AM, Eastert said:

I mean that bad economic will not let them wage war succesfully enough to defeat normal countries

That could work.

[Pds314 0]

Border gore would be partially fixed by more realistically dealing with encirclements. Also by making completely-disconnected areas suffer from rebelious tendencies.

[Pds314 0]

There are two types. One is from occupations. The other is from annexations. The solution to occupations is to fix combat.

Edited February 16, 2019 by Pds314

[Eastert 12]

18 hours ago, Pds314 said:

Border gore would be partially fixed by more realistically dealing with encirclements. Also by making completely-disconnected areas suffer from rebelious tendencies.

Yea, if army is encircled and unconnected with its capital it should become almost useless

Edited February 17, 2019 by Eastert