People said that navy is irrelevant, because IS A GAME, not history. If want to learn history, take a book, don't play games. And, if you don't know, Italy was a conglomerate of peoples who get together in a point, for example. Their create a culture after being united, didn't have one together before, much less only one ethnicity. If anyway the system of navy would be like a battle, but in the water, just make the units could travel on sea and it work the same way anyway. Under those parameters

Recommended by Łukasz Jakowski

13 reactions

Go to this post

AmericanLiberia 74

Posted June 9, 2024

1 minute ago, Денис Живков said:

You've got me completely confused. Why don't you want to add something new to the game that will be meaningless and buggy? What? I think Lukash himself knows what makes sense and if a thing is difficult to implement, then he will not add it. But still, it's worth giving him a chance to choose.

Why add something that is meaningless and buggy??? Don't make sense. And yes, Lukasz is who choose what is added and what not, the visualization can maybe (I don't think so, but maybeee) make him rethink and add those ideas? Nothing is lose by trying.

To be clear: I'm not against the new ideas, the ideas of others, or anything like that, don't get confused. I don't want the game to be complex, have meaningless functions or that those mechanics don't connect between them.