Ideas
2,764 topics in this forum
-
- 0 replies
- 283 views
The customisation system (particularly the editor) of Age of History II was quite fun and it was easy to spend hours creating in-depth scenarios with events, alliances and cores. I was looking forward to an expansion of the editor (like I'm sure many others were) as one of the things that made AoHII great was the customisation, however in AoHIII, in its current state, it feels like the editor has been stripped of various elements that made it accessible and fun to use. Events are now supposed to be manually created, and while it is not impossible, it does make it less accessible to the average user who wishes to make scenarios out of personal enjoyment, without need…
Last reply by HistoL, -
-
- 1 follower
- 0 replies
- 453 views
Kupiłem grę w dniu premiery, mam już w niej ponad 20 godzin i zmieniłbym kilka rzeczy. 1. Sojusze, irytujące jest to, że nie możemy podbić całego sojuszu, tylko państwo, któremu wypowiemy wojnę, tym bardziej, że rozejm trwa aż 7 lat. Szkoda też, że nie możemy tworzyć jednego sojuszu z wieloma państwami tak jak w AoH2. Zmniejszyłbym również chęć AI do zawierania sojuszy, ponieważ po roku gry prawie każdy kraj ma jakiś sojusz. 2. Unie, ultimatum - naprawdę brakuje mi tych funkcji. 3. System wasali, czyli większą kontrolę seniora nad wasalem. Mam na myśli możliwość zawarcia pokoju przez seniora jeśli obce państwo wypowie wojnę jego wasalowi, możliwość wezwania do…
Last reply by clevercat, -
- 0 replies
- 201 views
My idea is to add command "Help" which would show list of all commands.
Last reply by Nowarhia, -
- 1 follower
- 2 replies
- 522 views
Remove or lower the “you have to have at least 90% win rate to make demands”. Objectively, 90% is a lot. If I take over a country with someone, I don't have enough for anything but capitulation or white peace. This is illogical and annoying. Or, is there any way to lower this percentage or set it to 0% through the game files?
Last reply by Nikitilus, -
- 0 replies
- 262 views
I played Age of History 3 the day it came out and it was very fun, a bit of a learning curve but after around 2 hours I had built a Persian empire in the modern world. However there are somethings I noticed and wanted ask about/suggest. First of all, religions; I love this feature but there are inaccuracies. China and North Korea are eminently atheist countries, Japan to my knowledge is also Shinto, but all of these are classified as Buddhist in the game, the Mughal Empire is Hindu in the 30 years war scenario, although historically it followed Sunni Islam, that last one would make sense though if the civilisation religion was classified as what the majority population ha…
Last reply by Anhadsp, -
- 0 replies
- 275 views
Autonomy will dictate the power of a vassal. Autonomy will designate a vassal a certain power. Lords will be able to control their vassals depending on the amount of autonomy. Example being that if a vassal has high-autonomy, the lord has limited power over the said vassal. Annexation of Vassals If a vassal has essentially no autonomy, the lord will be able to annex it. Though it would require points to do so. Independence 🇺🇸🦅 A vassal could gain independence if their level of autonomy is extremely high. However, the vassal must dedicate large-sums of points to even reach this level. Levels To advance to independence, a vassal must commi…
Last reply by Popooy, -
- 1 follower
- 3 replies
- 867 views
First of all, I would like to ask why Multiplayer was not added to the game. There was a reason why Age of History 2 didn't add multiplayer to the game, and that was because the game wasn't a real-time game, whereas Age of History 3 was. We've been waiting for the multiplayer feature to appear in Age of History 2 for a long time. However, aoh2 was not released either. If there is no multiplayer in Age of History 3, we will have to wait for AOH4. I request it to be multiplayer.
Last reply by Ahbao, -
- 0 replies
- 277 views
I hope this game gets added a controls menu. So, I can change some hotkeys. Or atleast get to know them. That's it. Great game, It needs a lot of work from my 20 hours of playtime observations.
Last reply by Question, -
- 1 reply
- 233 views
Bring back the old vassal exemption. I mean, the new one is almost no different, but you can no longer choose your own state and liberate it on any territories, and that's a problem. For example, playing for the USSR I can not liberate Ukraine, Belarus, Kazakhstan, etc., because they have no claims to any territory, and in AOC2 I could choose the same Ukraine from the list of states and liberate it on any territory
Last reply by Mr. Rufus, -
- 1 follower
- 2 replies
- 497 views
¡Hola a todos! Esta es mi primera vez enviando una propuesta, así que espero que os parezca interesante la idea. PD: está escrito con traductor. Uniones e integraciones: Crear un sistema en el que se envíe una solicitud a otra civilización, la cual, de ser aceptada (teniendo 95 relaciones), iniciaría un proceso compuesto por misiones. Si se aprueba, el progreso hacia la unión aumentaría, pero si alguna misión falla, la barra de progreso disminuiría. Con esto los sindicatos serían posibles pero ya no serían fácilmente explotables. ¡Espero que te guste la idea!😃 @Łukasz Jakowski@Propied…
Last reply by Moisés gamer, -
pls
Last reply by Reodant2, -
- 1 follower
- 0 replies
- 341 views
who doesn't miss the variety of options in old diplomacy? they're what makes aoh aoh, advanced diplomacy!
Last reply by mmorin, -
- 0 replies
- 238 views
Sorry please, but when I played Age Of History 3 for 2 days, I identified 4 flaws in the game that you in future updates should fix: Question 1: Selling provinces, let's say I captured Poland for Germany and as history to give Vilnius to Lithuania, and the east of the USSR, and in the tab there you have to manually search for each province to give them. This is so inconvenient that it is better not to give them to anyone than 2 hours to sit and flip through the list of provinces to give Lithuania 5 provinces of Vilnus, and the USSR almost almost 100-200. Solution 1: Either to make a field with a search for provinces, as for example when in the editor looking for civil…
Last reply by Indepci, -
do something like this with one click you can build a building in all provinces with just one click
Last reply by Łukasz Jakowski, -
-
- 1 reply
- 321 views
In aoh2 it was so much fun to release as many civilizations as you wanted in territories you weren't particularly interested in. Please make this possible in aoh3 as well
Last reply by Bitum KERITSKI, -
.thumb.jpeg.d9f9e7b9593c4c3620e7742d20ac7c81.jpeg)
- 0 replies
- 192 views
1. Add annexation of vassals 2. add a religion head mechanic, for example: the head of Catholicism is the papacy and this gives the papacy bonuses to improve relations with countries of the same religion and convert provinces 3. Add navy 4. add Culture mechanics (just like religion)
Last reply by Aryati, -
- 0 replies
- 622 views
sugeruję dodanie opcji pędzla lub możliwości zaznacznia prowincji które chce się sprzedać ponieważ kiedy chce się np. zrobić ładne granice, scrollowanie przez ponad 400 prowincji jest uciążliwe
Last reply by hyvxx_, -
- 0 replies
- 180 views
Is it just me or the buttons for selecting tax-rate or military-funding is very lacking. Like, three options is not enough when compared to Age of History II. Please do consider my idea of expanding the options of the expidentures of stuff. As always - Here's an example. Tax Rate: 0% - 25% - 50% - 75% - 100% Or, more preferably. Use the bar-thingy where you could specifically choose the tax-rate. With it being an alternative to the aforementioned idea if you want to be more precise.
Last reply by Popooy, -
- 3 followers
- 3 replies
- 848 views
With the current method of peace negotiations, you can only take from the nation you declared war on and not from the other nations that came to defend it. For example, if I invaded Belgium and France came to her aid, I would only be able to annex Belgium but not France. This is rather annoying, especially since you would have to defeat France in this scenario anyway. Therefore, I think you should reintroduce the system from AOH2 where you can annex/negotiate with the multiple enemy nations at once.
Last reply by sc00614, -
- 1 follower
- 0 replies
- 430 views
Everyone probably knows that the post-war compensation mechanism in AOH3 has some issues. For example, France and the UK are allies. I play as Germany, and France declares war on me, calling the UK to join the fight. After a tough battle, I successfully defeat both France and the UK, and my war score reaches 90%. However, I can only demand war reparations from France and not from the UK, which is unreasonable. I understand that demanding land reparations from only one enemy at a time is to avoid border confusion, but is it possible to demand other types of reparations from other participating countries? For example, in the scenario where the UK joins France in a war …
Last reply by sc00614, -
- 1 reply
- 202 views
Add flag pictures to the ideology change menu. Personally, I and probably many other AOX2 players changed their ideology just to change the flag to a more beautiful one.
Last reply by YouravaragebrazilianAoCfan, -
Why not add trading, like the one that was in AOC3? The same purchase of the right of passage of troops is greatly lacking
Last reply by Nikitilus, -
-
- 3 replies
- 713 views
@Łukasz Jakowski could you create a mod in which countries during peace talks have 2 times less points to use so that they can take less provinces. I think that for people who want the game to last a bit longer and for the smaller border gore, this mod will be needed. (If in this mod countries will be able to take 2 times less provinces, then Declaring wars should also be 2 times more expensive in terms of aggressive expansion points)
Last reply by Łukasz Jakowski, -
- 3 replies
- 583 views
Sieges in their current state capture the neighbouring provinces upon successful siege, this might sound like a good idea (and it did sound good before playing the game), but now seeing how bad the system can become, it makes me feel like reverting to the standard one siege = one capture system like in other games is a good idea. While playing the game as Russia and doing the northern war against Sweden, I have come against Sweden and their allies who had numerical advantage where I had 60 size army spread out across the frontline and they had a 100 stack. The one stack would eventually destroy my armies in battles leading to me needing to regroup in Moscow. Th…
Last reply by Denis 2006, -
- 0 replies
- 369 views
can't annex vassals, can't add vassals to war, have to declare separate war on attacker if vassal gets attacked, i'd understand bugs in the game at this stage but to me it seems like not bugs but a bunch of weird shitty decisions made during the development of the game. also no unions.
Last reply by whocares,
