Ideas
2,791 topics in this forum
-
- 0 replies
- 614 views
As above. Though it should somewhat be similar to of the Steam's Workshop.
Last reply by Popooy, -
-
- 0 replies
- 840 views
I noticed that due to the fact that when adding a new technology ID, the entire technology tree is rewritten, which makes it impossible to run 2 mods with technologies I propose to make it so that the technology IDs do not rewrite the entire technology tree, but only the technology IDs
Last reply by Fire Quickly, -
- 0 replies
- 892 views
Allow us to release completely custom civilisations as puppets into the game, created directly in the release a vassal interface. I can see that balancing could be an issue, but as long as it's a single player game, that shouldn't be a problem.
Last reply by Trashcycling, -
- 0 replies
- 991 views
In AoH 2, if a province has more than two cores it's possible to set how the population is distributed between the cores. In AoH 3, well... you can't. Every time you start a new game the distribution is randomized. With two cores, sometimes the share is almost 50/50, other times almost 55/45 or 60/40. Basically the idea is: Be possible to set the population distribution between the cores in the scenario editor of AoH 3 like it's possible in the previous game. Example below from the core editor of AoH 2:
Last reply by Iceman, -
- 1 follower
- 0 replies
- 695 views
heeeeeey lukasz. how d you think about idea to give steam keys to popular modmakers, who maked popular mods for aoh2?
Last reply by mycat, -
- 1 follower
- 6 replies
- 1.6k views
Last reply by Das Moss Man, -
.thumb.png.1070fa079c7536cdf4061cac82260db0.png)
- 2 followers
- 57 replies
- 10.7k views
Hello Guys! If you like these ideas, then comment and react to the post so that the probability that Lukasz will see it is higher and therefore the probability that features will be adopted from this list! So i bought Aoh3 and i think we really need these features : -VERY IMPORTANT : Better and more Editor options ingame (Because not everyone can mod or plays on pc.) - One click build in all provinces - Multiplayer? - Maybe a focus tree system? (A focus tree system like in hoi4 which you can edit in scenario editor for different nations) - Civ Editor : Options for Different Names und Flags for different Religions and Ideologies …
Last reply by Mega4oSS, -
I think if we win a siege, the lands we have conquered should have a slight population decline, and slight decrease in growth rate, for a certain time like 5 years. @Łukasz Jakowski
Last reply by Wronislaw, -
- 0 replies
- 551 views
Can you add the required technology as a condition for building a certain wonder? I think it's important
Last reply by Pnompenb, -
- 0 replies
- 1.2k views
Since Lukasz Jakowski made the game exclusively for ancient times, many mechanics, and not only, are not compatible with modern scenarios and not only. 1. I agree with the combat system, if you try, even from this combat system you can make a front line without mods, just if Lukasz slightly changes the behavior of the AI with the help of technology. So that the divisions can line up in a front. 2. Selling provinces, let's say I captured Poland for Germany and as history give Vilnius to Lithuania, and the east of the USSR, and in the tab there you will have to manually search for each province to give them. This is so inconvenient that it is better not to give them to anyo…
Last reply by Indepci, -
- 0 replies
- 621 views
1. Flexible Combat System with Frontlines Concept: In the spirit of HoI4, create a dynamic front line system for modern periods. Implementation: Frontlines and Army Groups: Players can assign armies to the front, and they automatically line up along the enemy border, responding to changes in the enemy line. Tactical Orders: Add the ability to set tactical orders — such as "hold," "advance," or "retreat" — allowing for technology-dependent tactics by era. Strategic Fronts: Enable setting up fronts for large-scale operations, for example, along the border with an entire bloc of countries. 2. Province Transfer and …
Last reply by SamDerminji, -
- 1 follower
- 21 replies
- 4.5k views
Hello, We all know that vassals are now improved in AoH3, with the possibility to increase or decrease tribute and manpower, and whenever the vassal can declare war or can’t. But Łukasz, you could go further, by adding subjects. Subject is a larger term for vassals that could include other historical types. Some subjects must be seen as a government and others more like a special attribution. All will be present in the subject tab, but some would also represent the government. How each subject will work : Autonomy is an administrative division or internal territory of a sovereign state that has a degree of autonomy and self-g…
Last reply by YouravaragebrazilianAoCfan, -
- 1 follower
- 3 replies
- 1.5k views
There's some basic event outcomes from AoH2 that are missing in AoH3 for some reason White peace Leave alliance (regular alliance not special alliance) Free puppet Change civ opinion Also it would be nice to have event outcomes to end things like guarantees and non aggression pacts
Last reply by eNeXPii, -
- 1 reply
- 957 views
There should be a option to transfer state to vassals and an option to fully annex them after some time. Would be awesome aswell to have royal marriage and there for creating Personal Unions.
Last reply by MFFMCCTTS, -
- 2 replies
- 800 views
Just like how Age of History 2 has the Age of History 1 map, being able to play the Age of History 2 map in Age of History 3 would be cool. Could be added as a map. Plus would give mobile players the option to choose that map if they prefer it, since the smaller AOH3 map is not so different in terms of size.
Last reply by anonymous8, -
- 0 replies
- 554 views
Hey Lukasz, I'm presenting you my ideas for improvement for the ai of the game. I hope you like my ideas and will implement them. Best regards! The Ai should.... automatically break an alliance when under a specific opinion threshold with the targeted country. stop rivaling a country, if a specific positive opinion is reached. only rival a country, if the country has low opinion. only send gifts to countries that they have really high opinion with. only reduce the opinion of a country, if they have recently taken a province of them, had a war with them, are the rival of a rival, etc. I'll write more ideas, once I got them in my h…
Last reply by GuyNamedKortak, -
- 0 replies
- 558 views
I think it would be a cool Idea to make a system where a civilization can collapse in multiple ways. For instance, for larger empires instead of turning into dozens of smaller states It can do an Eastern / Western split that is commonly seen among historical empires in turmoil. Of course this shouldn't happen every single time as that would get old very quickly, but it would definitely be pretty cool to see some variation in how countries collapse. It would also be cool so see Parent and offspring nations, kind of like how Britain's colonization of America led to the United States, or how the dissolution of the Mongol Empire led to the Ilkhanate and various other hor…
Last reply by Zathriscm, -
- 1 follower
- 35 replies
- 5.3k views
Guys, I figured out how to replace the national spirits (you can see them when choosing a country, there are 3 pictures) with more interesting mechanics You can enter into the game (I have not yet figured out how to end them) the features of civilization, the country will have 3 features in the standard settings, but in the settings you can determine from 1-5. They can be viewed in the form of a board and by clicking on the flag. You can replace them with legacy points and money, but we won't get a bonus right away, and if we constantly change them, we'll get debuffs and riots will grow. There will be 7 categories of features: military, economic, administrativ…
Last reply by Денис Живков, -
- 0 replies
- 611 views
Unions can be made only once per game (don't know if it already was like this in aoh2) and would not be possible anyway if the combined provinces of the unifying civilizations exceeded a certain threshold. Ultimatums are always rejected if they demand all the civilization's provinces or a considerable amount of those. I think these features are reasonable and not too hard to implement since they would probably require some simple "if" functions. Lukasz, I hope that you take my advice into consideration.
Last reply by RennyTheSimpatic, -
- 0 replies
- 586 views
Since Lukasz Jakowski made the game exclusively for ancient times, many mechanics, and not only, are not compatible with modern scenarios and not only. 1. I agree with the combat system, if you try, even from this combat system you can make a front line without mods, just if Lukasz slightly changes the behavior of the AI with the help of technology. So that the divisions can line up in a front. 2. Selling provinces, let's say I captured Poland for Germany and as history give Vilnius to Lithuania, and the east of the USSR, and in the tab there you will have to manually search for each province to give them. This is so inconvenient that it is better not to give them to anyo…
Last reply by Indepci, -
- 0 replies
- 489 views
You can add this as a feature Mr @Łukasz Jakowski Like a menu for them,Who can pass?,Pass Tax,passing limit and income from them.The income calculated with provience economic status.
Last reply by hakan_03022011, -
- 1 follower
- 2 replies
- 1.1k views
I will present this idea in a very specific way to expose exactly what I mean; the details are actually of little importance. war_score "war_score" trigger would make event check if the sides are at war AND one side is winning with a specific war score advantage Example of code: war_score=ger=pol=50 This trigger would check if Germany is winning with Poland with at least 50+ war score. War score would be checked from the perspective of the first tag. If we swapped tags, for example: war_score=pol=ger=50 It would mean that Poland has to be winning with at least 50+ war score in a war against Germany. Optionally we could be able to i…
Last reply by Leemon, -
- 5 replies
- 2.3k views
Nowadays, the tax efficiency is very overpower since the percentage of upgrade is infinity, allowing to make like 1000% of efficiency. This leads to creating a huge rank civ points and breaks some features, for example, the colonization, since only top 7 AIs can colonize. If you Prevent to make a infinity tax efficiency, like a condicional to disable the button when the efficiency of a provínce is higher than 100%, the game would be more balanced Edit: My issue was because I changed a file and got ridiculous tax efficiency lol. In comments I show how to fix tax efficiency if you think that default configs is overpowered for your game.
Last reply by Brunoo1103, -
- 1 follower
- 0 replies
- 812 views
Czy usprawnisz system sprzedawania prowincji? Chcę sprzedać kilka prowincji mojemu wasalowi, a szukanie ich na liście i klikanie w każdą z nich jest męczące. Dobrym pomysłem byłaby możliwość zaznaczania prowincji za pomocą pędzla.
Last reply by Bargor, -
- 2 replies
- 1.1k views
Nations should be able to change religions. This affects historicity in scenerios. One exmple, Circassia is still orthodox in 1800s while it should be Sunni from 1500s onwards.
Last reply by empyao,
-
Recent Achievements
-
-
Posts