Suggestions

The Ability to change flags of nations during scenarios: Changing flags can be done by customising the flag or by a file (rectangular and cube flags are only allowed). To access the flag editor, go to diplomacy, scroll until you find Change flag (in between Vassals and Take Loan), you can choose between Customising and File (it should not be a gif)

in case Lukasz wants to fix some errors, I listed border errors to improve the game, and whoever finds others can list them in the comments 1- Tibet independent (it was actually part of China) 2- Nepal part of India (it was actually independent) 3- Bessarabia Romania (was part of Russia, however) 4- Country state scenarios are not really that important to have to be 100% correct, but these Brazilian borders are a bit strange so I marked them I think there are others but the ones I noticed are here

@Łukasz Jakowski

Hello Łukasz and everyone else who reading this. I would like to introduce my idea that could fit AoH3 easily. As a person who tried making game and publishing it to the peoples, I know that period between game release date declaration and that release the most intense. So I guess that there no chance for my idea to be added at release. But game would be updated, right? Right? Alright, lets go. Civilization traits is a thing that belongs to a certain civilization, not a leader or province. Civilization thaits for each civilizations in each scenarios are different. Civilization traits couldn't be removed or added easily, instead some conditions should met. Civil…

There should be an Event Outcome that makes the country that gets the outcome intervene in a war of a specific country. Example: France and Germany are at war and player civ is the UK, the UK gets an Event due to having good relations with both Germany and France, the Event is about both countries being at war and the UK can choose a side through the Event, or choose to stay Neutral in the conflict. Excuse me if this is already in the game as an outcome.

Hello, Regarding buildings, once more. Buildings should also be upgradable. Why, you may ask.. It'd be nice to upgrade buildings. Whereas the bonuses, especially in resource-specific buildings - Mines, Plantations -, would increase every upgrade. For example: Farm -> Farm I -> Farm III -> Mechanized Farm Iron Mine -> Iron Mine I -> Iron Mine III Limits: Each upgrade is limited by the technological advances the player has made. Also, administrative-cost will surely increase per said upgrade. Thus, concludes the topic. Note that I do not expect this to be done before release-date..

Add chemical weopons & biological woepons with the same system as nukes, thanks @Łukasz Jakowski

@Łukasz Jakowski Could you add crusades to the game? Some civilizations of one faith recruit an army, unite and join a crusade against countries of another faith.

this is really simple, you can change the province state from colonized to uncolonized and even to wasteland territory (maybe) thoughts? @Łukasz Jakowski

Hi! This is a repost. I think I posted in the wrong area before. Looking at the last videos, I thought a lot about how to make nukes work better, in a more realistic way, so we don't have everyone nuking everyone when the tecnology is achieved. I thought a simple but effective way to make it works. Atomic doctrines - Tec tree First of all, we need a more sophisticated tec tree for nukes, not for add more atomic weapons types, but to update how we use them. I thought at something like this: FIRST STRIKE DOCTRINE > TACTICAL BOMBING DOCTRINE > ASSURED DESTRUCTION DOCTRINE I am going to explain them. First Strike Doctrine: If at war with a…

In AOH2, changes in government do not significantly impact the civil issues of a nation, so I hope that changes in religion in AOH3 will have a strong influence on the population, thereby adding more diversity and richness to the gameplay. - Religion should be able to increase various individual stats, such as happiness, economy, military strength, population growth, technological development speed, and especially the relationships between different religions and countries sharing the same faith, based on the real characteristics of those religions (for example, Muslim countries might have higher diplomatic scores, while relationships between Buddhist countries may n…

@Łukasz Jakowski I have an idea to add to the game a function of organizing color revolutions in other countries, thus changing the government in these countries to one loyal to us. Lukasz Jakowski is it possible to add this function to the game?

the title may seem weird but the idea is very good, it's pretty much a better version of the switch player civilizations event outcome, the idea would be that this event outcome would allow the player to return to the choosing map and choose a civilizations from the currently existing ones without the need for a specific event that makes him switch to ONE particular civilization that you have to enter the tag for, this would allow the player to actually choose from wherever civilization they want, it's like a ''switch player civilization'' pro max @Łukasz Jakowski thoughts?

I know, short topic. But.. Building images or names should really change throughout the ages. For example: Amphitheater -> Theater. Images and Names will change based on the era. Though the bonuses remain the same..

since we have alot of localized and more province based event outcomes and triggers, i think an event outcome that allows us to change the demographic of a province should be a good idea, it'll work like this: Province_Demographic_Change:30% CivTag:Pol ID:2444 This is a pathetic illustration of what it would look like, you would be able to enter the percentage of the people that'll change their group and what group they will change to (the ID in the code is the province ID) @Łukasz Jakowski thoughts?

GDP, GDP per capita, territorial expansion There should have more accurate ways to mensure the data of the country. The territorial expansion of countries, not just in provinces, but also on Kilometers or Miles. Example being showing Russia with 17m KM². GDP being the national treasure of the country, that will replace the economy system of the second game. This would show how much the country you're taking a look has in gold, and would give you an idea of how difficult it would be to invade it. However, this should only work on modern scenarios, as older eras, the countries wouldn't know the GDP of other countries. And GDP …

可通行的内河

We know that after the siege we will occupy the besieged province and all the neighboring ones. But if there is an enemy army stationed on the neighboring province, then this province should not become occupied It shouldn't be like this: This one province where the enemy army is should not be occupied

будут ли претензии к территориям, например, что ДНР и ЛНР являются территориями России, но у Украины будут претензии на эти регионы, и их можно будет отдать

Latest list of outcomes: Link Some event outcomes from AOH II are missing, so there is a list of the ones I think should be added (some are from AOH II, others are new) Outcomes: ● Liberate vassal ● Leave alliance ● Force surrender (if the add_truce doesn't do that) ● Force white peace ● Form civilization (insert a new civ on the map) ● Join/leave alliance organization ● province_population_id (so it's possible to modify the population of a specific province) ● Update province population percentage ● Update relation between two civilizations ● Trigger a disease in a specific province or in the civilization

I suggest the developer consider adding modifiers for individual civilizations and provinces. A certain effect is imposed on the entire civilization or on an individual province/provinces, which can be changed/lost and acquired only under certain conditions. Modifiers can be By date: 1)Permanent 2) Temporary By nature: 1)Positive 2)Negative According to the conditions: 1)Depends on the mission 2)Depends on the event 3)Depends on time 4)Depends on the building 5) Depends on the province... Examples 1. If a civilization owns the province of Singapore, it receives the modifier “Crossing the Strait Fee”, +N% tax income to c…

It would be logical, when taking into account the share of production from the world and the rank in the table of resource producers, to transfer the corresponding indicators of vassals to their overlords. This is necessary so that civilizations with vassals (colonies) with other resources can also qualify for producer bonus No. 1 Otherwise, imagine, for example, Great Britain, which has no bonuses at all, except from coal. Although their British India is top in dyes, rice and spices, for example. (I apologize for the vulgar English. I relied on the norms of my native language)

Hello, While watching, I did notice there were little-to-no incentives for resources. Yes, I know resources provide an economic-boost. But, that's all to it.. Thus, I made this topic. Resources should also be utilized to construct buildings or infrastructure. Additionally, resources could also be used to manufacture weapons. This could also be an incentive for trade. Where nations trade to benefit one another. That be all. 👃

𝐀𝐙𝐄𝐑𝐁𝐀𝐈𝐉𝐀𝐍𝐈 𝐓𝐑𝐀𝐍𝐒𝐋𝐀𝐓𝐄 I am posting my translation here. If there is any mistake, let me know and I will correct it. Aoh3 Trasnlate Remastered Again: 100% by Novruz Aoh2 Trasnlate: 100% Contributors: Yuskaa, Yusif Aliyev, Kalkansizviking and Novruz Tərcümə: Çevirdiyim tərcüməni bura atıram. Hər hansı bir səhvlik varsa mənə bildirin düzlədim Aoh3 Tərcümə Yenidən Yeniləndi: 100% Novruz tərəfindən Aoh 2 Tərcümə Edildi: 100% Əməyi Keçənlər: Yuskaa, Yusif Əliyev, Kalkansizviking və Novruz 𝐀𝐙𝐄𝐑𝐁𝐀𝐈𝐉𝐀𝐍𝐈 𝐓𝐑𝐀𝐍𝐒𝐋𝐀𝐓𝐄 translation_Azerbaijani_Aoh2.txt AzerbaijaniLanguageForAOH3.txt

In the latest video about steam workshop mods the scenario 725 heptarchy, despite the scenario having the island of great britain being the only one having civilizations, the minimap still shows the entire map even though most of it is empty neutral provinces. It should be like aoc2 where the minimap only shows the areas with civilizations and a small surrounding