Suggestions

You know how in Age of History II. It takes one turn for the other country to respond to our alliance-request? In Age of History III. This should also be done whenever you want to call your vassals, or request alliance. A delay will make it more realistic..

Hey guys here i will talk about some ideas i think it will make the game better : 1/ adding a supply situation to the armies every army will have a stock of supplies enough for two months , if the two months pass you will have to resupply your army by sending them food from your kingdom resources or let them take it by force from your enemies land , if you don't resupply them in the first week they will take a hit in their moral , in the second week they will leave your army or worse they will rebel with their general , of course the supply situation only apply when you leave your land to the enemy land , and if you cross to your vassals land they will have to…

As you can see, the border between the Russian empire and the ottoman empire is wrong, russia had control over kars so showing it as ottoman is wrong Also, the ottomas held the city of Didymoteicho until 1915 when they gave it to Bulgaria, as stated in the treaty of Constantinople in 1913 "Bulgaria acknowledged Ottoman gains of Adrianople (mod. Edirne), Kırklareli and Didymoteicho and the surrounding territory. The Ottoman Empire ceded the port of Dedeagach (mod. Alexandroupoli) to Bulgaria."(Can't find a map of Bulgaria in 1914 but you can see the following Wikipedia pages: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bulgarian–Ottoman_convention_(1915) and http…

The land would only be given to Belgium after ww1, before that it belonged to germany.

Hi! Looking at the last videos, I thought a lot about how to make nukes work better, in a more realistic way, so we don't have everyone nuking everyone when the tecnology is achieved. I thought a simple but effective way to make it works. Atomic doctrines - Tec tree First of all, we need a more sophisticated tec tree for nukes, not for add more atomic weapons types, but to update how we use them. I thought at something like this: FIRST STRIKE DOCTRINE > TACTICAL BOMBING DOCTRINE > ASSURED DESTRUCTION DOCTRINE I am going to explain them. First Strike Doctrine: If at war with another nuclear power, it will use immediately the atomic weapon…

Last year i made a post on my old account @dodoaltac about a historical AI mod that i wanted to do using events and missions, well today im proud to announce that IT'S IN THE WORKS Originally the mod was gonna start in the year 1200 AD, but since that's not an available start date in the current scenario's, the mod will likely start off from 1070 or the 1300's scenario, but the most probable path is the 1300's scenario with an extension that starts at 1070 once everything is done Here's the phases that the mod will likely go through 1300's start date to 1440 AD - this will be the first phase of the mod, in which i'll start messing around with…

i saw the new video and, when you decleared war on Serbia, you could see their army. i suggest you make it that it would show 15k-25k instead of showing 20k (their army), so you dont know how powerfull they are.

UPD: I will do that mod by himself

Hi when u Open menus it makes a special Sound effect countries get also different colored menus based on their religion/culture for exmaple: Further more islamic countries get green Buttons and ui While Christian yellow Jewish blue Buddhist differenr shade of yellow Hindu Orange Shinto red Athiesm black Jain white Stuff like that @Łukasz Jakowski Its like how ck2 adds flavour unlikes ck3 for example

In the game screenshots of modern era/ww2 scenarios in aoh3, I've noticed that the population icon is still the same one as medieval ages, it would be better if there was a different icon for modern eras where the pop icon has a more modern outfit. and maybe a more modern pop icon would start appearing by the victorian era (1830)

Like the title of the post says, I just wanted to ask for more accurate provinces if possible! I'm using WW2 ones as examples and some I'd be really happy for but I'm sure there are many others. I thing it would be great if the provinces looked more historically accurate if possible. Either way I'm glad Lukasz is making this game and I of course I won't mind if every single province is 100% accurate. Wish you the best and keep up the good work! Also remember to take breaks whenever you need!

@Łukasz JakowskiTibet in 1836 was of the Qing Dynasty, and there are errors in the territory of the Qing Dynasty and the Russia Empire, so I will show you the territory Southern Tibet after 1903 was British India, after 1846 Aksai Chin was British India, and after 1962 it was Chinese.Taiwan belonged to Japan after the Treaty of Shimonoseki and to the Democratic Progressive Party of China after 1949. Can you give me a picture of China in 1914? Thank you!

Chodzi mi tylko o to by bot gdy atakuje nie zostawiał pustych prowincji na swoich tyłach. @Łukasz Jakowski

In the recent video about the nukes, when looking at the war statistics, the death toll did not include the 500k deaths from the nuclear bombings.

Mod features: • adding canals • 1 or 2 new terrian types • better espoinage system • simple yet effective naval units • adding a few key new generals • adding a simple focus tree like system • Major events from events from about 1100 - 1400 • fixing & improving everything from 1900 - now aswell • atleast 5 new start dates (622, 1102, 1200, 1279, 1346) • Focus on 3 different eras, (620-730, 1100-1500 & 1900-now) • New provinces (such as vatican, splitting Berlin, jeruslaem & more) • fixing Bugs, missing civilizations, even…

There was no revolution or ideological change in any country between 1440 and 2400. When technology opens up and ideologies are available to change, when unhappiness across the country drops to 40% or less, there should be a risk of revolution. It can help change the ideology of these countries. There must be such a demand from the people.

Hello Lukasz, I just came to ask if building Nukes will require a Silo? He asked this to make it harder to get this type of weaponry in the game since the AI throws 6k Nukes per minute at their enemies.

As you can see, a lot of the border looks strange and does not correspond to many historical maps, which does not look good. It is worth noting that in the AoH2 there were no such problems and all the borders fit perfectly with the maps. I suggested options for how these borders should be made so that they look historical for their era, I of course understand that the game was created for the Middle Ages, but in any case it would be nice to make provinces for modern centuries

I saw your new post I saw your new post on Steam and saw the GROTESQUE error on the Mato Grosso x Pará borders in the "Brazil" scenario I apologize for posting this correction on this forum, I didn't know where to post it

When the Arabic language was added by a friend in age of History 2 , it appeared in reverse. When you work on the Arabic language file, write the sentences and words in reverse. The second thing is, can you add a feature to add own civilization through files on the mobile? The third thing is that you did not show us the special shapes when adding own civilization through the game, or is that not possible?

1. Dynamic Government Evolution System AI Government Evolution: Develop a mechanic where AI-controlled countries can change their government type based on specific conditions over time. These conditions could include technological advancements, economy level, stability, and social progress. For example: Tech-based Evolution: Once a country reaches certain technological milestones, it can no longer remain a tribal government. For example, if the country develops technology beyond a specific threshold, they must upgrade to at least a monarchy, democracy, or dictatorship. Economic Prosperity: If a tribal country experiences economic growth beyo…

Maybe alliances should be colored? So you can see which country is allied with whom. Right now it looks pretty chaotic.

Hello my people, lords, vassals, counts, and kings. This will be my last idea until AOH3 releases. I wanna say. THANK YOU! For all the support through these whopping seven months. This platform has been one of the best things I've ever experienced, it helped me not go insane. And I even gained a friend @Naval. Now as my last idea I'm going back to my roots, with my very first idea. Shared Territory: In aoh2 the only bit of shared territory was Oregon in the Victorian scenario, and it was just neutral territory. But I see an opportunity that hasn't been tapped. It will have the occupied territory over lay but instead of the lighter color of an occupying country i…

Could it be possible to add the event trigger "If the ruler is (insert ruler name)" I feel like it could be more realistic as adding an event like the five year plans when Joseph Stalin is the ruler would make sense rather than if Vladimir Putin is randomly in a WWII scenario. Thats all, literally.

As we know in aoc2 it is very annoying and hard to force vassals to join their lord's faction A good and useful idea when trying to make vassals join the player's alliance is if there is an option to make vassals/colonies/puppet automatically join the alliance of their lord. And if the vassal manages to become independent, they would be more likely to stay in the alliance if relations with former lord are high, if relations are very low or neutral, the vassal is less likely to stay in the alliance and will decide to immediately leave it +if a civilization is part of an alliance that loses a war and gets puppeted by an enemy alliance, then the civilization l…