Suggestions

I would like to suggest that, in addition to the current requirements established by Mr. @Łukasz Jakowski, additional requirements be considered for forming a civilization. Specifically, I believe that ideology and religion should be key factors. For example: - The Russian Empire cannot be formed with modern-day Russia, which is a republic, unless you change your ideology to monarchy. - Bavaria, being Catholic, cannot form the German Empire, which was officially Protestant. - If Bavaria forms the German Empire, the empire becomes Catholic, leading to revolts among Protestants. I hope it's not too late to incorporate this mechanic into the game.

Then thru events the demilitarized zone can change back to normal But basically either a New terrian type or a terrians may have a impassable Status in which can be applied to territoires that r demiliratized & also others for example thick deserts, jungles & mountians which are impassable such as Sahara, Himalaya & amazon! Also make crossing rivers take slightly more time ingame @Łukasz Jakowski

Like in hoi4 Japan gets imperial protectroate and some other type of puppet Imperial Subject & Imperial Associate based on puppet leval Ussr gets socialist republics internaly & people's republics for other nations like warsaw part countries such as hungarian & polish people's republics & germany gets reichkommistrats & Reichsprotectorates Uk gets dominions colonies & mandates based on puppet level @Łukasz Jakowski Add this as a Option & make it customaziable

1.Just like.hoi4 poltical parties & pie chart work to represent the major ideology & party 2.Also add a Triangel allignmeent Triangel that shows the closesnesss of countries to the main factions in each scnerio just like hoi3 it can be represented thru closeness as in ideology (if u decide to add a poltical system & or if u want to make it easier on terms of relations to such countries with that ideology or what would be unique & more accurate if it was for both) @Łukasz Jakowski

Будет ли идеология анархизм ?

have army boundaries according to the skills of generals example: General 1: Combat experience:400 Attack bonus:5 Defense Bonus: 7 Maximum Army assignment limit:30 General 2: Combat experience:700 Attack bonus:8 Defense Bonus 4 Maximum Army assignment limit:48

1. Fragmentation After Defeat Mechanic: If you lose a major war, your nation could fragment into smaller states or regions. Example: If you're playing as the Second Bulgarian Empire and lose a devastating war, parts of your nation could break off into independent entities like the Tsardom of Vidin, Dobruja, or even revert to Byzantine or Ottoman control. Triggers: Large war losses (both military and territory). Loss of key cities or capitals. Outcome: Your country could splinter into independent states, each with their own goals, leaving you to manage a much smaller, weaker version of your former empire. …

I think the title speaks for itself, anyway, I want to clarify what I mean by "Non-sovereign Civilization." A non-sovereign civilization would be a country that is in a situation where it has 0 provinces (This does not include occupied provinces), however, its entity continues to exist through the Cores of its former provinces. Having 0 provinces in AOH2 represented a total defeat and there was nothing else to do but become a spectator or change civ, leaving your old civilization in oblivion, but this does not necessarily have to be the case in AOH3. (I want to make it clear that this idea can be executed in multiple ways within the game. What I will talk abou…

Hi just wondering if its possible to add them as a Mission for base game ww2 germany so after every conquest it can happen that the Player can create them & Release them as puppets

Of course, I've done the translation for the first text file a long time ago, but I'm posting this here because I've finished the translation(s) of the final text. Already sent them via email a few weeks ago, but since I've gotten no reply from Łukasz I've decided to post them again here just to be safe! (For some reason it isn't letting me attach the translations here, so if you're reading this Łukasz check the email I've sent you!)

Im wondering if theres anything like cool unqiue and all that or mechnics apart from everything that has been shown like what plans do u have for the game pre Release and Post Release in the future Any surprising cool unique or feautures yet to be shown or to be annonced? Such as future dlcs ideas Among other things? @Łukasz Jakowski

I not sure if @Łukasz Jakowski has changed his mind and decided to add ships, but here's my idea. Age of History 3 is already a bigger, more ambitious game, and not including ships - whether warships, transport vessels, cargo ships, or blockade runners - would cut out a significant portion of the game's content, features, realism, and fun. It's easy to add ships; they would be like land units but at sea, with some unique characteristics. How can you have a cavalry army fight a knight army in the middle of the ocean? Yes, it's odd and humorous, but it's not too much to ask for ships. Just allow us to build them in ports - transport ships, warships, suppo…

I propose to Lukasz Jakowski to add terrain, city types and province population triggers. City Types : Make event only concern a certain types of city, in a country, or in the world. All major and capital cities will build defense building, to bo only occupable by directly siege it. This will make wars more challenging if it must siege a major city to occupied it, than only the capital to occupy it. Province Population : Make some revolt event for x country: This is useful for event related to the province population. If a province is under the required population number, than it isn't concerned. Ex: growth rate decrease by 15% in…

I think it will be cool to add an option like join/leave HRE As well as the possibility of the country joining to HRE under a peace treaty @Łukasz Jakowski

Hello Lukazs, I have seen the recent video and I would like to suggest that we can only intervene in wars when: We are World Powers, Regional Powers or when we have a high friendly relationship with one of the two sides. What do you think about this?

So, countries are divided into multiple military districts(zones), which are handled by generals, each zone provides 1 supply hub in major cities of the said zones, the generals are lower ranked and usually take orders by the player and the military advisor. Smaller countries to 20 provinces will have 2 zones, countries with 21 - 40 provinces will have 3 military zones, countries with 41-70 will have 4 and any more will have 5 military zones, but the player can create them manually too. The reason I had this idea is because I remembered Russia has multiple military districts, and the southern one is managed by Gerasimov. @Outlawexperience @Łuka…

Yep.

Greetings! I have made this translation for croatian language, I saw that someone made translation for Bosnian/Croatian/Serbian, but that translation uses words and forms that are not used in croatia, so I've made this translation from scratch. If there is some stuff that can be translated better, feel free to correct me. Keep in mind that i tried to use croatian expressions over internationalisms. translation_hr.txt

volunteer unit in foreign conflict (like hoi4), also manpower and Economic aid. @Łukasz Jakowski

In this topic, we write the names of cities that should change their name depending on who controls the province. Example: Germany: Gdańsk=Danzig Wrocław=Breslau Byzantine Empire Istanbul=Constantinople Vatican Rome=Vatican A list of all cities in the game is attached. cities.json

As technology develops and eras change, some ideologies/regimes should acquire noticeable debuffs, since they have already exhausted their progressive sides and now, on the contrary, are stopping development. That is, if outdated ideologies are preserved, the lag of such a country in economic and scientific development will accumulate over time. This will avoid the widespread spread of absolute monarchies, nomadic hordes or tribal federations in the 20-21st century A similar idea to this is presented in the following sentence:

You could add an option to be the one who decides the negotiations, for example, there are several wars in a game and in the wars a winner comes out instead of the one who decides being the winning country, it is the player who controls the game. It would seem like an interesting mechanic because I sincerely want to control a game that way, I hope that if you add it it would be an original mechanic.

I noticed in the videos that after selecting a country and pressing the play button, it seems like nothing happens, which can be a bit underwhelming. It would enhance the experience if there were a sound effect, similar to what we hear in HOI4, to signal that the game is starting or transitioning into play.

1. can a ruler rule two countries at the same time 2. Will there be any female rulers like Elizabeth I for example?

I've asked this question before, but now it's more interesting to me than ever. Since any of my questions on the forum have six ideas inside it and no one answers to the point, I will ask it in TOPIC. Will there be anything that will threaten the player in the game itself, other than coalitions? Maybe there will be a unique state. There, for example, in 1789 there will be a superevent for the revolution and France will be given mega bonuses and the king will be overthrown, and a new political regime with a bunch of military bonuses and a handsome Napoleon in power will come in his place. I would like to see crises in the game, all sorts of gameplay-compl…