Suggestions

For example Hinduism u can pick out of 4 dieties to give u bonuses simple system just like eu4 (personal diety mechnic) For Islam for example u have to balance peity or else ur country would become either sufi or salafi but usually it starts out in the middle, also ability to pick a specfic denomination which again out of 4/5 can provide small bonuses (for example for sunni nations, hanafi, hanbali, maliki,shaf'ii,zahri) For different forms of paganism if added later: For Nordic pagans it can be picking a god out of 4 for example Odin and 3 others one specifc one which will give a small bonus For specfic pagan nations it would choose which diety means …

I suggest that somewhere in the war overview screen there is a text indicating the war name (example in the image below) The generic war name would be "Attacker-Defender War" but there is more: I suggest the option to edit the war name, so it's possible to have custom war names, like Second World War or Thirty Years' War.

Will non generic events (country specfic and historically specfic & relevant events to specfic countries for example specfic events like Olympics, certian pandemic like 1918 and historically relevant events like Mongolinvasions, timurids, many many historical Civil wars, black death, crusades, Columbus colonizing, reconquestia fall of constanipole ww1 & ww2 and events corropending to them be in the game or will the game simply have scenarios that don't have events/thing happen historically & feel empty like the last game??????) Also same thing for country bonuses/(what they call national spirits in hoi4) wil they be random or will there be nation specfic …

So.. look..I advise that Age of History 3 would have the same mechanics as in other similar games that lead the player through the epochs of humanity. 1. Some mechanics in one era will not be important in the next. 2. Also, thanks to events (or revolutions), it is possible to change the system to a more important one in this era. 3. Under the influence of other states, the country itself can change the system. 4. The goal of the game should not be, as in the cartoon "Pinky and the Brain", to capture the whole world. It's just that somewhere at the end of the game, some civilizations cannot withstand the changes and fall apa…

Why game has russian, polish and ukranian language but not belarusian?😭

Hi, To start, we all know that we don't siege castles in WW2, so all I suggest is to have a second war system which the occupation is as it was in AoH2, a one-to-one occupation system that could be unlocked in the tech tree. Imagine, a game with two war systems, a unique feature in strategy games ! This would force AI to make fronts, and then, make modern wars more convenient. The time for occupation could vary by the importance of the province. So capital cities could be longer to occupy. The second thing I want to talk about is to make the retreat different. The army who retreats must move to ONLY one province beside. Like the war system I propose, it could be…

I think it would be pretty interesting if a leader of feudal vassal or junior partner vassal could be enlisted as a general during warfare or the lord just has the ability to recruit as much men as it can from that vassal, I also hope that a lord can be able to control its vassal foreign policy so there wont be any random wars that you end up dragged in because of your vassal

If you could be able to play as a rebel there could be an exclusive option where the rebel could stage a coup against the civilization they are rebelling against to overthrow the ruler once they end up captured

I think that if you colonize a land you can not only religiously convert it but also be able to introduce resources native to your civilization just like when coco beans. There could be a different unit that could be something like with the settlers except their job is to extract resources from their colonies and bring it to your civilization. I wish that's how trading could work, where there could be a unit that retrieves resources from a different civilization and produces it in their civilization in return for some money or an alliance idk

I think that this idea would help with the thing about religions which is where a Christian ruler, possible general like Joan of Arc could be canonized as a saint which would give it higher relations with the Papacy as well as in increase in legacy points. This could be achieved by success in Crusades or some sort of event miracle.

If it isn't in the game, I would recommend adding it as it would be cool if you are able to make events that would, for example, change a monarch because the previous one died.

I believe it would help a lot in organizing events if they were separated by country when creating scenarios, this would help especially in scenarios with a ton of events. Creating global events would also be very interesting, being something added by modders in age of history 2. just a random pic

It is more convenient to post here. And for the last time. ( The shape that I did is not 100% accurate) 1. Pristina : add Mitrovica 2. Ferizaj : add Gjilan 3. Tetovo : add Zunica 4. Ohrid : add Struga 5. Radovish : add Strumica 6. Vranje : Option 1 ; add Bosilegrad Option 2 ; add Medveda 7. Change Drama and Xanthi shapes 8. Change Pirot shape. Some of these provinces could be for some historical scenarios : WW1, WW2. Option 1 : Option 2 :

We could divide the population into three social classes, likewise, it will allow us to collect taxes independently of each one. Also, it will affect our economy, a nation with a large number of lower classes will not generate as much wealth as a nation with a large population of upper classes. Therefore, laws and reforms will become more important in the game. Something similar to the Victory 2/3 system. (It occurred to me just when I was reading a book about the French Revolution.)

I don't know if this has been suggested, but there should be a tab where you can see your past wars, participants, casualties and other information related to them.

1. The requirement to demilitarize the area. Example Treaty of Versailles 2. The requirements are to lease to the region for 1-50 years(balance). Example The Qing Empire 3. The requirement to dismantle the fortress/military fort. Example Prut Peace Treaty, The Treaty of London (1867) This practice has been quite common in history. this way the game will become more interesting and multifaceted

1. Will the Belarusian language be included in Aoh3 along with the Ukrainian language? 2. I hope that in Aoh3 there will be teams, such as a team where you add a certain number of population/money in the selected province; you add a certain amount of money to the treasury; or a team that in the selected province you spawn a certain number of divisions, but not just a number, but also adding a unit tag or you can also add a generals tag, I also know that Aoh2 was created on Windows 7 32-Bit, and because This is that Aoh2 is a 32-bit game, then the maximum amount of money/population/army/economy is 2,147,483,647 (Since this is the maximum 32-bit number), but I want Lukasz …

Im kind of interested in this since in the recent video I saw a government on Venice that said "Merchant" what exactly will that do and what is the purpose of resources in the game if you are not capable of trading them?

Will we have navy units in the game ? We already have versatile land units so I don't see what could stop the existence of water units

I will say this here because the religion post is so crowded my idea will be lost in a sea of ideas So pretty much, certain religions have debuffs and buffs for converting other religions, example: Hinduism has debuff for converting sunni provinces, sunni has buff for converting conquered christian provinces (to simulate spread of Islam) but gets debuffs if the state is fundamental in their state laws, Catholicism has buff for converting paganism, same for orthodoxy, And about the monument conversion, certain religious monuments (if u plan to add those) like the great mosque of cordoba can be converted if conquered by Catholicism, same for the opp…

It could be a mechanic like "Westernization," for example in the year 1750, only European countries gain the "Westernized" effect. This effect could have positive impacts on core creation cost, tax efficiency, and goods produced. Non-European countries could unlock the "Westernization" mechanic after 1840, and to be "Westernized," they would need to be at the same technology level as any European country that has gained a "Westernized" effect. I think this could simulate European superiority during the 1700-1900 period in a historical context. It was present in the early stages of EU4 but was removed, however, in a longer-term game like AoH3, it could be a good idea.…

In the latest video investment in the economy and in population growth is shown. Unfortunately, it looks like there may be a similar bug as in AoH 2 When you invest in province with 1% growth rate nothing changes (like in AoH2 bug with 99 economy where no matter how much you invested, it was always 99) The second problem in AoH 2 was exhaustion of investment opportunities (once the farms were built, it was no longer possible to invest in the province's population also, if the economy was too high, instead of profits from the provinces, there were giant losses. The consequence was that after some time it was impossible to invest in the population, and investing i…

Please Lukasz, add a culture map mode. One of the best things you can do in AoH2 and other similair grand strategy games is roleplay as a country that is passing throughout its eras in history, and of course, with every war, with every major event exploration, expansion, emigration and immigration the demographics of the country will change. Now , to create a pop system similair to Vic3 or vic2 would be too hard and time consuming, I'm aware, but what I ask for is so much more simple: a Culture map mode, where every province is assigned a different culture based on the era, and this culture (which can also be interpreted as ethnicity, tribe or linguistic group) can change…

So, guys, my suggestion is that when the world changes. The player builds sawmills, carbon dioxide is released. When they invent something like an aerosol, there is a slight climate change. Some territories are being flooded. In addition, volcanoes have been almost the most important thing in the entire history of human society. The Great migration of peoples began with him. The most terrible year in the history of mankind 536 began due to natural disasters and climate change. And the atomic bomb is somehow too merciful judging by the video. @daniiiiiii @IKayzerI @aa30388 @Unity @Alexey Navalny @Mov@Łukasz Jakowski @Diego1…

That's what I think, but what if some kind of high technology is achieved by some state alone. . Let's imagine that they are too tall. While in 50 BC the Romans were fighting ordinary infantrymen, some tribe of blackfeet from North America reached the low peaks and fought with high-tech cyborgs, transformers and fired lasers from their eyes. It is logical that this threatens not only everyone on their continent, but, in principle, the entire world order. Therefore, many countries will intentionally spoil relations (but they will not enter into wars against an over-expanding power (by the way, add this coefficient of "over-expansion", which spoils relations with some count…