Suggestions

Nepotism (0): - Foreign spy detection: -15% - Advisor cost: -45% - Tax Effeciency: -25% - Production Efficiency: -15% - Yearly corruption: +40% Meritocracy (100): - Foreign spy detection: +15% - Advisor cost: +45% - Tax Effeciency: +5% -Production Efficiency: +5% - Yearly corruption: -10% 0 represents Nepotism while 100 represents Meritocracy, and all values are 0 when it's at 50. Each country has its own unique starting value in the game. This value can be increased through events, missions, or by using legacy points. What do you think?

@Łukasz Jakowski

Lietcnistiesn, San Marino & Andorra r in the game so why not the Vatican, how hard would it be to create a small province within Rome & assign the Vatican to it?

In AoH2, the beginning of human history starts with the establishment of the first civilizations, starting with a tribe and progressing into modern times. Will we see the same in this new map? In this type of map, what kind of differences will we encounter? For example, will we see things like obsidian and mammoths? And what specific changes will there be in the game in relation to this? Furthermore, if there is a concept like this in the game and we are playing on a foggy map, starting from the ancient ages, can we prevent the names of the provinces from being visible to us in order not to know exactly where we are? It would be great if even the b…

Currency Change: In the scenario of 1440, there exists ducat gold, which is not present in today's world. How could this be handled? Perhaps in 1840, every ducat gold in the game could be converted to USD dollars by dividing it by 240, as 1 ducat gold today is approximately equal to 240 dollars. Inflation: There should be a base inflation rate in the game that increases proportionally with any economic growth, reflecting on buildings as well. Combining the above example: Example: A building with 100 ducat gold in 1440 would have a value of approximately 13.5 million ducat gold in 1840 with a 3% base inflation rate over 400 years (100×(1.03⁴⁰⁰)). When d…

I think that if we are going to participate in wars, not only the commanders but also the head of the state should be at the head of the army, for example, there are 2 armies and the head of the first army should be the head of the state or the king.

If you decided to ally with a civilization against another one there could be an ability to switch sides if the war is not going well for you or ally and instead ally with the winning civilization (I know its pretty cowardly in real life)

What line charts would you like to see in the game? From the beginning of the game to the current date. Here is an example of a player's civilization income. Some ideas: Player's population Player's economy,

Beer and pigs religious prohibitions Religiously, the use of beer and pork products is prohibited in Muslim countries, so in the game, they should be banned for a long time in Muslim countries and should not be produced. Later on, in modern times, beer production may be allowed, or there may be limited production for military use. However, if there are pigs, it should definitely be prohibited. This attention can also be taken into account in other religions.

Alliance Internal Competition and Rules 1.0 When alliances are formed, they should be able to vary according to the ideologies, religion, and even cultural characteristics of the participating countries, and there should be various types of alliances. In addition, they should influence the foreign policies of member states in the game. I have some suggestions for alliance types: Religious alliances (Crusades and Caliphate) Coalition Military General alliance Religious alliances are alliances that have very great influence on all countries belonging to that religion as religious values. Coalitions are relatively short-l…

Major projects in the world such as canals can be created by major powers and states that own the land in the age of imperialism. Great canals like the Suez, Panama can provide various economic benefits and prestige. The construction time should depend on the size of the population and the financial power in that region. At the same time, naturally occurring canals and straits should provide additional prestige and economic contribution. Strategic locations should have higher points compared to other locations and may have defense bonuses

If we have a large empire or state, with the ability to have very large armies, or if we are playing in a time period close to modern times, can we create a hierarchy among commanders? For example, If we are managing a large empire and have a massive army of 3 million, which means we have 3000 units. Units can come together under a commander, with a maximum of 30 units forming a company of 100 units. This way, we still have a massive army. From videos and information provided by Lukasz, we know that armies can be managed by AI in the game, but to add realism, a simple mechanics can be added where one commander, or marshal, can have 10 commanders under them. Th…

1.Ability to name them what u want 2.Ability to disband one if ur the leader /nation who created the alliance 3.Ability to leave alliances Other suggestions: 4.If strong enough u may become a alliance leader also in wars a major participant/combatant/war leader if u become strong enough @Łukasz Jakowski

Pretty much, players will be able to make focuses for certain countries, this will allow players to make historical ai themselves instead of lukasz and will be interesting, events could be involved but I feel focuses for certain countries/cultures will allow for players to etch historical AI, this would mean the fanbase would mod/make historically accurate ai from 1200 to the modern period, this could also fix the bordergore issue as historical borders are not too gorey

For example Hinduism u can pick out of 4 dieties to give u bonuses simple system just like eu4 (personal diety mechnic) For Islam for example u have to balance peity or else ur country would become either sufi or salafi but usually it starts out in the middle, also ability to pick a specfic denomination which again out of 4/5 can provide small bonuses (for example for sunni nations, hanafi, hanbali, maliki,shaf'ii,zahri) For different forms of paganism if added later: For Nordic pagans it can be picking a god out of 4 for example Odin and 3 others one specifc one which will give a small bonus For specfic pagan nations it would choose which diety means …

I suggest that somewhere in the war overview screen there is a text indicating the war name (example in the image below) The generic war name would be "Attacker-Defender War" but there is more: I suggest the option to edit the war name, so it's possible to have custom war names, like Second World War or Thirty Years' War.

Will non generic events (country specfic and historically specfic & relevant events to specfic countries for example specfic events like Olympics, certian pandemic like 1918 and historically relevant events like Mongolinvasions, timurids, many many historical Civil wars, black death, crusades, Columbus colonizing, reconquestia fall of constanipole ww1 & ww2 and events corropending to them be in the game or will the game simply have scenarios that don't have events/thing happen historically & feel empty like the last game??????) Also same thing for country bonuses/(what they call national spirits in hoi4) wil they be random or will there be nation specfic …

So.. look..I advise that Age of History 3 would have the same mechanics as in other similar games that lead the player through the epochs of humanity. 1. Some mechanics in one era will not be important in the next. 2. Also, thanks to events (or revolutions), it is possible to change the system to a more important one in this era. 3. Under the influence of other states, the country itself can change the system. 4. The goal of the game should not be, as in the cartoon "Pinky and the Brain", to capture the whole world. It's just that somewhere at the end of the game, some civilizations cannot withstand the changes and fall apa…

Why game has russian, polish and ukranian language but not belarusian?😭

Hi, To start, we all know that we don't siege castles in WW2, so all I suggest is to have a second war system which the occupation is as it was in AoH2, a one-to-one occupation system that could be unlocked in the tech tree. Imagine, a game with two war systems, a unique feature in strategy games ! This would force AI to make fronts, and then, make modern wars more convenient. The time for occupation could vary by the importance of the province. So capital cities could be longer to occupy. The second thing I want to talk about is to make the retreat different. The army who retreats must move to ONLY one province beside. Like the war system I propose, it could be…

I think it would be pretty interesting if a leader of feudal vassal or junior partner vassal could be enlisted as a general during warfare or the lord just has the ability to recruit as much men as it can from that vassal, I also hope that a lord can be able to control its vassal foreign policy so there wont be any random wars that you end up dragged in because of your vassal

If you could be able to play as a rebel there could be an exclusive option where the rebel could stage a coup against the civilization they are rebelling against to overthrow the ruler once they end up captured

I think that if you colonize a land you can not only religiously convert it but also be able to introduce resources native to your civilization just like when coco beans. There could be a different unit that could be something like with the settlers except their job is to extract resources from their colonies and bring it to your civilization. I wish that's how trading could work, where there could be a unit that retrieves resources from a different civilization and produces it in their civilization in return for some money or an alliance idk

I think that this idea would help with the thing about religions which is where a Christian ruler, possible general like Joan of Arc could be canonized as a saint which would give it higher relations with the Papacy as well as in increase in legacy points. This could be achieved by success in Crusades or some sort of event miracle.

If it isn't in the game, I would recommend adding it as it would be cool if you are able to make events that would, for example, change a monarch because the previous one died.