Ideas
2,767 topics in this forum
-
- 1 follower
- 0 replies
- 366 views
There should be an Event Outcome that makes the country that gets the outcome intervene in a war of a specific country. Example: France and Germany are at war and player civ is the UK, the UK gets an Event due to having good relations with both Germany and France, the Event is about both countries being at war and the UK can choose a side through the Event, or choose to stay Neutral in the conflict. Excuse me if this is already in the game as an outcome.
Last reply by Haloele, -
-
- 1 reply
- 260 views
Hello, Regarding buildings, once more. Buildings should also be upgradable. Why, you may ask.. It'd be nice to upgrade buildings. Whereas the bonuses, especially in resource-specific buildings - Mines, Plantations -, would increase every upgrade. For example: Farm -> Farm I -> Farm III -> Mechanized Farm Iron Mine -> Iron Mine I -> Iron Mine III Limits: Each upgrade is limited by the technological advances the player has made. Also, administrative-cost will surely increase per said upgrade. Thus, concludes the topic. Note that I do not expect this to be done before release-date..
Last reply by Popooy, -
- 0 replies
- 250 views
Add chemical weopons & biological woepons with the same system as nukes, thanks @Łukasz Jakowski
Last reply by xox, -
- 1 reply
- 363 views
this is really simple, you can change the province state from colonized to uncolonized and even to wasteland territory (maybe) thoughts? @Łukasz Jakowski
Last reply by Wayne23lololh, -
.thumb.png.52d6c34e53fa9db4beaa1a69d6a35a44.png)
- 0 replies
- 285 views
Hi! This is a repost. I think I posted in the wrong area before. Looking at the last videos, I thought a lot about how to make nukes work better, in a more realistic way, so we don't have everyone nuking everyone when the tecnology is achieved. I thought a simple but effective way to make it works. Atomic doctrines - Tec tree First of all, we need a more sophisticated tec tree for nukes, not for add more atomic weapons types, but to update how we use them. I thought at something like this: FIRST STRIKE DOCTRINE > TACTICAL BOMBING DOCTRINE > ASSURED DESTRUCTION DOCTRINE I am going to explain them. First Strike Doctrine: If at war with a…
Last reply by Aliex999, -
- 1 follower
- 0 replies
- 252 views
In AOH2, changes in government do not significantly impact the civil issues of a nation, so I hope that changes in religion in AOH3 will have a strong influence on the population, thereby adding more diversity and richness to the gameplay. - Religion should be able to increase various individual stats, such as happiness, economy, military strength, population growth, technological development speed, and especially the relationships between different religions and countries sharing the same faith, based on the real characteristics of those religions (for example, Muslim countries might have higher diplomatic scores, while relationships between Buddhist countries may n…
Last reply by Minhcity, -
- 0 replies
- 278 views
the title may seem weird but the idea is very good, it's pretty much a better version of the switch player civilizations event outcome, the idea would be that this event outcome would allow the player to return to the choosing map and choose a civilizations from the currently existing ones without the need for a specific event that makes him switch to ONE particular civilization that you have to enter the tag for, this would allow the player to actually choose from wherever civilization they want, it's like a ''switch player civilization'' pro max @Łukasz Jakowski thoughts?
Last reply by OwnM3Z0, -
- 2 replies
- 279 views
since we have alot of localized and more province based event outcomes and triggers, i think an event outcome that allows us to change the demographic of a province should be a good idea, it'll work like this: Province_Demographic_Change:30% CivTag:Pol ID:2444 This is a pathetic illustration of what it would look like, you would be able to enter the percentage of the people that'll change their group and what group they will change to (the ID in the code is the province ID) @Łukasz Jakowski thoughts?
Last reply by Iceman, -
- 2 replies
- 1k views
GDP, GDP per capita, territorial expansion There should have more accurate ways to mensure the data of the country. The territorial expansion of countries, not just in provinces, but also on Kilometers or Miles. Example being showing Russia with 17m KM². GDP being the national treasure of the country, that will replace the economy system of the second game. This would show how much the country you're taking a look has in gold, and would give you an idea of how difficult it would be to invade it. However, this should only work on modern scenarios, as older eras, the countries wouldn't know the GDP of other countries. And GDP …
Last reply by YouravaragebrazilianAoCfan, -
可通行的内河
Last reply by YouravaragebrazilianAoCfan, -
- 0 replies
- 257 views
We know that after the siege we will occupy the besieged province and all the neighboring ones. But if there is an enemy army stationed on the neighboring province, then this province should not become occupied It shouldn't be like this: This one province where the enemy army is should not be occupied
Last reply by Rodak Polak, -
- 1 reply
- 280 views
будут ли претензии к территориям, например, что ДНР и ЛНР являются территориями России, но у Украины будут претензии на эти регионы, и их можно будет отдать
Last reply by Matvey, -
- 3 replies
- 529 views
Latest list of outcomes: Link Some event outcomes from AOH II are missing, so there is a list of the ones I think should be added (some are from AOH II, others are new) Outcomes: ● Liberate vassal ● Leave alliance ● Force surrender (if the add_truce doesn't do that) ● Force white peace ● Form civilization (insert a new civ on the map) ● Join/leave alliance organization ● province_population_id (so it's possible to modify the population of a specific province) ● Update province population percentage ● Update relation between two civilizations ● Trigger a disease in a specific province or in the civilization
Last reply by Matvey, -
- 1 reply
- 334 views
I suggest the developer consider adding modifiers for individual civilizations and provinces. A certain effect is imposed on the entire civilization or on an individual province/provinces, which can be changed/lost and acquired only under certain conditions. Modifiers can be By date: 1)Permanent 2) Temporary By nature: 1)Positive 2)Negative According to the conditions: 1)Depends on the mission 2)Depends on the event 3)Depends on time 4)Depends on the building 5) Depends on the province... Examples 1. If a civilization owns the province of Singapore, it receives the modifier “Crossing the Strait Fee”, +N% tax income to c…
Last reply by Matvey, -
- 4 replies
- 482 views
Hello, While watching, I did notice there were little-to-no incentives for resources. Yes, I know resources provide an economic-boost. But, that's all to it.. Thus, I made this topic. Resources should also be utilized to construct buildings or infrastructure. Additionally, resources could also be used to manufacture weapons. This could also be an incentive for trade. Where nations trade to benefit one another. That be all. 👃
Last reply by Popooy, -
- 1 follower
- 8 replies
- 1.1k views
In the latest video about steam workshop mods the scenario 725 heptarchy, despite the scenario having the island of great britain being the only one having civilizations, the minimap still shows the entire map even though most of it is empty neutral provinces. It should be like aoc2 where the minimap only shows the areas with civilizations and a small surrounding
Last reply by Noobs Dudes, -
- 7 replies
- 487 views
Guys, I came up with an idea of how to organize banks in the game They do not have a territory and from this they receive income from buildings Example the capital bank will have a bank headquarters building, it generates income, and for this income we can build buildings in countries The countries in which we built the building can tax them (we give away part of the income). The country can regulate the tax (up to 75 percent) and even ban our activities and nationalize the building) But the most interesting thing is that banks can offer loans to countries (with interest) Banks will have recruits themselves due to the fact that they will …
Last reply by Fire Quickly, -
- 1 reply
- 339 views
We desperately need a place to report piracy websites for lukasz to take action against, the moment the game goes up on steam it'll be flooded all over piracy websites, PLEASE FOR THE LOVE OF GOD give us a place where we can report these websites without others seeing our posts (so they don't get the game for free from there) WE NEED THIS, IT'S VERY EASY @Łukasz Jakowski if you won't be able to deal with the large amount of piracy websites atleast create this feature in the forums until you hire people/get people from the community to remove them on your behalf, otherwise you'll make very little considering the exchange rate between euro's and dollars
Last reply by YouravaragebrazilianAoCfan, -
- 2 replies
- 361 views
The videos show that some countries are vassals of one one country throughout the entire game. It's a bit strange. I would introduce something like this, that if a country is a vassal for 100 years continuously, after that time it declares independence (even if it has very good relations with its lord) It looks stupid when Transioxana is a vassal of Timurid for 500 years continuously
Last reply by Yahya, -
- 2 replies
- 303 views
Lukasz, what do you think about add the PC map on the settings of the android version?
Last reply by Yahya, -
- 0 replies
- 192 views
Could you add a system that adds landless wandering armies that spawn in random areas, that can be hired by a civilization with money or a resource, there could also be a rarity were some wandering armies can automatically attack a nations armies if they are near them like bandits.
Last reply by mordred, -
- 1 reply
- 298 views
I saw in Bwa's video that Mali was passing through areas without civilization occupying, lands that were not "colonized" It's cool to be able to pass through these areas, but my idea is that when passing through there, there could be a chance of the troops decreasing, insinuating that they died in the crossing, or even becoming slower (since these lands are not controlled, there would be no infrastructure and security) This way, the AI and the player would only pass through there when it was really necessary, as it would normally be better to take the "longer", but safer and faster route
Last reply by Joaoj, -
- 1 follower
- 4 replies
- 470 views
9:50 If the AI attacked with its armies, it could have won the war. The AI is not focused on sieges, it only attacks the player's units and it can't do it correctly. There are 10 days left for the game to be released. If the AI is fixed, many people will like it. I wish you good work.
Last reply by Ragronr, -
- 1 follower
- 0 replies
- 569 views
Hi @Łukasz JakowskiI think that occupying all provinces adjacent to the one that was sieged is a bit much, I know it's to counteract with how many provinces are going to be but I think for the early game at least that should be a unlockable upgrade down the road. Speaking of it is the mobile version which is gonna have less provinces going to have this type of siege system?
Last reply by Anon6969, -
- 1 reply
- 232 views
at the very start of each scenario while we're choosing our civilization i think we should 10000% get the ability to choose whether technology will be research based or era based how it'll work? very simple. in AOH3 there are multiple ages, the age of information, age of feudalism etc etc, well the technologies will be divided based on that, certain technologies like colonization will be researchable starting in the Age of discovery, this will make it so certain civilizations can still unlock tech trees before everyone else if they're more technologically advanced already while still stopping gunmen and nukes from being used in the 1700's like we saw in the 14…
Last reply by DRM,
-
Recent Achievements
-
-
Posts