Suggestions

I would like to propose that you add an immigration option to aoh3. It would allow population to move away from their province or country if the economy of said province is too low. This could be used by low population countries to get on a fairer playing level and force the nation that is experiencing emigration to improve their economy.

In Age of History 1 and 2, ideologies could be changed radically and quickly. However, there was no visible change in popular influence and administration. In the new government system, if people are added to the game, there must be the ideologies of the people, if not, the ideologies of the people or race in the country. For example, we can give an example from Italy. Let's assume that there are intensely humanist and democratic people in Italy. As the player, we want to turn the state into a Roman empire. This is the time so that we can spread our ideology through propaganda and disabling other political parties (such as closing down parties, taking them into gove…

Large countries can use resources to create religions. They will spread to each other through the army or naturally at the borders. Special unit missionaries can be used to speed up the spread of religion. Added "Holy City". After the holy city of a religion is occupied, the leading country of that religion (the Papal State or something like that?) can initiate a "holy war" and require all countries of that religion to join the war. Religions are divided into levels. The more followers the religion has, the higher the level and the faster it spreads. Religion also affects international relations and add the option of religious victory (I use google tra…

In order not to declare war so easily, it would be good to add as an example: justification of war or a referendum to complicate the process of seizing new territories.

I have put together a list of small but cool ideas for new features in AOH3 here it is. Idea 1: Fog of war hard version It would be cool so if you have fog of war you can select hard and u will only be able to see your borders at start and it will be very dark then use military (possibly scouts?) to explore new territory but you will have to scout a lot because it is hard and will only show a little bit when exploring so u have to explore a lot. Idea 2: Age of Civilizations rework Age of Civilizations is a mode in AOH2 where it will spawn you as a random country and u have to discover other random countries and win the game. I say there should be a opt…

Instead of flat map we could have a globe map like on google earth. I know it's probably impossible but I would be cool af

1. Multiplayer. By the name, it is clear that AOH lacks multiplayer. It's already known. 2. I would like to add the ability to build factories to AOH. There should be several types of them. 1 for the extraction/production of products that can be sold to other countries and have a profit from it. These plants can produce/extract resources, let's say metal. Let's say 1 level 1 factory produces 1kg of metal. Level 2 will already produce 2 kg and the like. They can also be used to create equipment. 2 type of factories for the production of machinery. That's what metal is for. The equipment can be different - transport, merchant ship. This technique can be used, for examp…

This is, essentially, a new option which shows, in cronological order, all the finished and ongoing wars. Concept:

That would be cool

I propose possibility of vassal flags like in Scenario+. Like,if you puppet a country,it will change the flag accordingly.

Let’s assume that AoH3 will have a similar selection of scenarios as AoH2. Having that in mind, here are some ideas to make all the start dates feel different: - 962-1806 - HRE mechanics, similar to EU4. Or EU3, you decide. The default 1440 scenario should also have a lot of events/event chains, seeing as it’s the scenario most people play. - 1815-1914 - A greater focus on maintaining and growing an economy, industrialization, development of political ideas, nationalism and nationalist rebels, AI focus on maintaining a balance of power and colonialism instead of going ham with conquests. Greater penalties for taking land for both AI and player, maybe a me…

We need more control over the vassals. Gor example: "move vassal army" if the vassal army on this province that we clicked. Change vassals goverment type option

Here are my ideas for the Ideology system in AOH3! Idea 1: More ideologies Just make more like splitting monarchy into constitutional and absolute monarchy or splitting democracy into democracy and authoritarian democracy. It would be below the custom civilization creator in the menu. Idea 2: Custom Ideology Creator It would be cool to make your own ideology with ease! Idea 2.325: Already Existing Civilizations Being able to change the ideology flags for already existing civilizations would be cool but probably not needed because of the custom civilization creator. Idea 2.650: Custom Civilization Ideology Flags Being able to change …

Complete evolution of the trading system and the "Load flag, leader" option (just like on YouTube, Twitter, Facebook etc. when you set your own profile picture and the File Explorer opens)

Instead of clicking on every province, assimilation should be more automatic just like development, more money into assimilation = faster assimilation. Also in some countries like Yugoslavia minorities like Croats should be counted as other nationality but be same as your nation (pay taxes and be be able to become a soldier) - aka giving rights to other nationalities. (Something similar to Imperator Rome) Sorry for bad English

For example. make ai not annex provinces that don't directly border them, and also make them relase some nations sometimes , and also try to not separate the conquered nation like creating a million scattered pieces.

Well if he really is gonna drop a Aoh3 Well then I have some ideas you guys might like 1: more trade Options. So you know how We can make farms And stuff right? Well I want to do id that I'd be able to collect carrots carrots and stuff also collect wood be able to make mines And then sell all of that And put up a prize now If you trade with someone your relations will improve And I like that idea also when you have a large army and are doing a conquest you need to build supply camps but There should be a option to turn or off this and also it will Increase your income 2: Be able to aid your allies or anyone By aid I mean sen…

Is it possible for the game to add dynamic province names based on the owner of that province? For example, German Alsace-Lorraine should have the city names in German, not in French. The same goes for the colony city names (if France colonised the US they would have French city names).

the game is supposed to be about 1440 to begin with, but if you don't change that and make the game scenario about WW2 or modern society, there will be less to add and it will be boring.

The nationalist movement that emerged with the French Revolution and the Industrial Revolutions spread to various parts of Europe and beyond in different years through communication, telecommunication, and books. It would be great to incorporate this into the game. For example, the desire for unification among German and Italian city-states after these events, or the increasing desire of nations within the Ottoman Empire and other empires to establish separate states, should be depicted. However, we would need certain parameters for this. For instance, there should be espionage activities to fuel or hinder nationalist sentiments. Moreover, if this…

the ability to create and edit flags and names of alliances, the ability to create not only military alliances but also economic ones (and alliances that exist in our world today), enter an internal chat into alliances to communicate only with the people of this alliance, establish the leader of the alliance, only the leader will be able to decide when and with whom to start a war (in the past parts of the game, the members of your alliance declared war on other countries without your permission, this led to unnecessary wars)

I think there should be politics pie chart where the player can change the ideology and leader based off of decisions they made in the game.It would be great for scenarios such as the Modern Day and it would add some realism to the game

Fransız Devrimi ve Sanayi Devrimleriyle birlikte ortaya çıkan milliyetçilik hareketi, iletişim, telekomünikasyon ve kitaplar aracılığıyla farklı yıllar Avrupa'nın çeşitli bölgelerine ve dağılımlarına yayıldı. Bunu oyunun dahil edilmesi harika olurdu. Örneğin bu olaylardan sonra Alman ve İtalyan şehir devletlerinin birleşme isteği ya da Osmanlı İmparatorluğu ve diğer imparatorluklar Güçlerinin ulusların ayrı devletler kurma isteklerinin yeniden başlaması anlatılmalıdır. Ancak bunun için bazı etkiler azaltılacak. Mesela milliyetçiler körükleyecek veya engelleyecek casusluk faaliyetleri yürütmelidir. artı bu fikir Fransa'dan geleceksa öncelikle Avrup…

the ability to create and edit flags and names of alliances, the ability to create not only military alliances but also economic ones (and alliances that exist in our world today), enter an internal chat into alliances to communicate only with the people of this alliance, establish the leader of the alliance, only the leader will be able to decide when and with whom to start a war (in the past parts of the game, the members of your alliance declared war on other countries without your permission, this led to unnecessary wars)

I feel like assimilation should be made significantly more difficult and there should be a mechanic to tolerate cultures that aren't your own, allowing partial recruitment potential and reduced revolt risk (among other things). This would more accurately portray the reality of multiethnic states such as Austra-Hungary