Suggestions

@Łukasz JakowskiTibet in 1836 was of the Qing Dynasty, and there are errors in the territory of the Qing Dynasty and the Russia Empire, so I will show you the territory Southern Tibet after 1903 was British India, after 1846 Aksai Chin was British India, and after 1962 it was Chinese.Taiwan belonged to Japan after the Treaty of Shimonoseki and to the Democratic Progressive Party of China after 1949. Can you give me a picture of China in 1914? Thank you!

Chodzi mi tylko o to by bot gdy atakuje nie zostawiał pustych prowincji na swoich tyłach. @Łukasz Jakowski

In the recent video about the nukes, when looking at the war statistics, the death toll did not include the 500k deaths from the nuclear bombings.

Mod features: • adding canals • 1 or 2 new terrian types • better espoinage system • simple yet effective naval units • adding a few key new generals • adding a simple focus tree like system • Major events from events from about 1100 - 1400 • fixing & improving everything from 1900 - now aswell • atleast 5 new start dates (622, 1102, 1200, 1279, 1346) • Focus on 3 different eras, (620-730, 1100-1500 & 1900-now) • New provinces (such as vatican, splitting Berlin, jeruslaem & more) • fixing Bugs, missing civilizations, even…

There was no revolution or ideological change in any country between 1440 and 2400. When technology opens up and ideologies are available to change, when unhappiness across the country drops to 40% or less, there should be a risk of revolution. It can help change the ideology of these countries. There must be such a demand from the people.

Hello Lukasz, I just came to ask if building Nukes will require a Silo? He asked this to make it harder to get this type of weaponry in the game since the AI throws 6k Nukes per minute at their enemies.

As you can see, a lot of the border looks strange and does not correspond to many historical maps, which does not look good. It is worth noting that in the AoH2 there were no such problems and all the borders fit perfectly with the maps. I suggested options for how these borders should be made so that they look historical for their era, I of course understand that the game was created for the Middle Ages, but in any case it would be nice to make provinces for modern centuries

I saw your new post I saw your new post on Steam and saw the GROTESQUE error on the Mato Grosso x Pará borders in the "Brazil" scenario I apologize for posting this correction on this forum, I didn't know where to post it

When the Arabic language was added by a friend in age of History 2 , it appeared in reverse. When you work on the Arabic language file, write the sentences and words in reverse. The second thing is, can you add a feature to add own civilization through files on the mobile? The third thing is that you did not show us the special shapes when adding own civilization through the game, or is that not possible?

1. Dynamic Government Evolution System AI Government Evolution: Develop a mechanic where AI-controlled countries can change their government type based on specific conditions over time. These conditions could include technological advancements, economy level, stability, and social progress. For example: Tech-based Evolution: Once a country reaches certain technological milestones, it can no longer remain a tribal government. For example, if the country develops technology beyond a specific threshold, they must upgrade to at least a monarchy, democracy, or dictatorship. Economic Prosperity: If a tribal country experiences economic growth beyo…

Maybe alliances should be colored? So you can see which country is allied with whom. Right now it looks pretty chaotic.

Hello my people, lords, vassals, counts, and kings. This will be my last idea until AOH3 releases. I wanna say. THANK YOU! For all the support through these whopping seven months. This platform has been one of the best things I've ever experienced, it helped me not go insane. And I even gained a friend @Naval. Now as my last idea I'm going back to my roots, with my very first idea. Shared Territory: In aoh2 the only bit of shared territory was Oregon in the Victorian scenario, and it was just neutral territory. But I see an opportunity that hasn't been tapped. It will have the occupied territory over lay but instead of the lighter color of an occupying country i…

Could it be possible to add the event trigger "If the ruler is (insert ruler name)" I feel like it could be more realistic as adding an event like the five year plans when Joseph Stalin is the ruler would make sense rather than if Vladimir Putin is randomly in a WWII scenario. Thats all, literally.

As we know in aoc2 it is very annoying and hard to force vassals to join their lord's faction A good and useful idea when trying to make vassals join the player's alliance is if there is an option to make vassals/colonies/puppet automatically join the alliance of their lord. And if the vassal manages to become independent, they would be more likely to stay in the alliance if relations with former lord are high, if relations are very low or neutral, the vassal is less likely to stay in the alliance and will decide to immediately leave it +if a civilization is part of an alliance that loses a war and gets puppeted by an enemy alliance, then the civilization l…

Some army units are too heavy/unfit to go to sea Knowing the army types and whether an army can go to sea or not would also be very useful in modding

Zoom-Out Vassal Name Unification: When zooming out on the map, the names of vassal states would be replaced by the name of their overlord or suzerain. This would give the appearance of a unified empire or kingdom. The lord's name would cover all territories under the lord’s control, including any vassal territories. This visual simplification would make larger kingdoms or empires look more cohesive when zoomed out, even though they still have separate vassals in terms of gameplay. Additional Features: Optional Toggle: Players could toggle this feature on or off in the game settings, so they can choose whether to see individual vassal na…

They should be constructable only in specific provinces (like real life)

Lukaz jakowski,Could you tell us how to customize the events of Age Of history 3?

I'm not claiming anything, but what if you combine provinces into regions (as they do in AoH2) and make bots try to annex lands based on them? It doesn't have to match the regions exactly, but it should at least try. That way, the borders that change over time might look more reasonable.

Ideologies that can be created and only apply to 1 country What do u think @Łukasz Jakowski

Editor Mr. Łukasz, please give an option to import images for country flags and leaders in AOH3 mobile version using the file manager(s), because it'll very annoying to import images in the mobile version if it stay the same as AOH2. Also add custom ideology or even custom religion maker or editor in the editor of AOH3. Console commands Give the option to use the virtual keyboard in the mobile version please, the built-in keyboard in AOH2 sucks and it'll be way better if we just use the virtual keyboard in the mobile version. 😭 (I don't know I've you've answered these questions in previous topics)

Ya

Unit Bonuses What i would love to see in the game are dynamic unit bonuses, bonuses like +2 attack or defense in forest province or even sea province i dont think this idea is all that unique and someone else might have already posted something similar but i believe adding this gives more thought into were you put your army and the best strategic decision to minimize loses. Leader bonuses Also im not sure if this is in the game or not but leader traits/bonuses i think leaders should get both good and bad bonuses things that kinda make you want to assassinate your leader to get a new one along with the option to give or change certain traits leaders hav…

Just wondering, how many soldiers in a 1 soldier unit only, how many Tanks in 1 tank only unit how many planes in 1 unit of them alone , 1000 or what? @Łukasz Jakowski

for the current leader of the bulgarian royal family in 2020s he should have this image (taken 2017) but for when he was the tsar he should have this other image and in the 2000s this image (taken 2005) soo this is important as the tsar of bulgaria was the king of bulgaria from 1943-1946 and then prime minister of bulgaria in 2001 to 2005 this is not a problem only for leaders that leave for a long time then return like him if Queen Elizabeth II was added in the 2000s This would be her image but for the 50s to 70s this would be her Image for the 2020s this would be her image and 1945 for good measure she would have this image so people get older and their images change an…