Suggestions

I don't know if it's done this way, but it would be good if we could get different bonuses depending on the strength of the rival we choose - the stronger rival we choose, the bigger bonus we will get, and the weaker rival, the smaller bonus. Just so it's not the case that choosing San Marino as a rival gives us exactly the same bonus as choosing the Soviet Union as a rival.

Co gdyby w aohIII były unie personalne, działałoby to tak: Aby wejść w unię personalną z jakimś krajem trzeba być w sojuszu oraz mieć powyżej 80 relacji, wtedy kiedy kraj zaakceptuje będziesz mógł grać oba krajami na raz np: jeśli grasz polską i Litwa zaakceptuje unię personalną, w lewym górnym rogu będziesz miał flagę Polski i Litwy i przez podwójne kliknięcie w jakąś flagę będzie można zmienić państwo którym się gra

Since we have reforms and laws, I think it would be interesting to add a new mechanic called "Quality of Life." This mechanic would be responsible for the citizens' quality of life, for example: whether they can eat, work, pay taxes, purchasing power, etc. Of course, there can be various factors that impact this. If the Quality of Life is low: - Increase in chances of civil unrest by 25% to 50%. - Decrease in consumer goods by 25%. - Economic efficiency -25%. - Research efficiency -35%. If it is high: - Increase in food production by 15%. - Increase in taxes by 10%. - Risk of revolution -…

It would be interesting to add the Goitacá tribe,was a tribe on the border of Rio de Janeiro and Espírito Santo. which was terminated by the Portuguese and by the neighboring Indians themselves

Hello my mein people today we'll be talking about patriotic-wars, and international relations. I will divide my idea into segments to make it more easy to digest. Starting with, patriotic wars: What I mean by patriotic Wars is buffs for defensive wars. But first you need to enact some propaganda laws, then you can declare a patriotic war. Which gives some bonuses to your troops, like, cheaper units, faster divisions, and more volunteer troops. More authoritarian nations would be faster at diong this. Second, international relations: After the 24 of october 1945, declaring war on someone was declared illegal. So if you declare war on someone past this date it shoul…

There are a number of scenarios that should be added: Cold War, World War I, Post-World War I, Napoleonic Wars, and BC. Each scenario has a series of events, for example, the Cold War scenario must have the event of the Vietnam Civil War or the Korean War Or, for example, the scenario after the First World War should have the rise of fascism or the Russian (Soviet) civil war Another thing, each scenario should be planned so that in addition to the events of the scenario itself, it also has the events of other scenarios For example, when you play with Osmani in the World War I scenario, when you lose the war, the event of the emergence of Ataturk (this event is for after W…

When you want to see the population of your country, it is better if the game shows you the population accurately, what does it mean? That is, it shows you how many people are children, how many are adults, and how many are old, which is an important thing in laws and government, which I will explain in the next post. what is your opinion? Is this an interesting idea?

Laws and government play an important role in your country. In the previous post, I wrote about the idea of the population, that the population should have old people, adults and children. Let's go for this idea School funding: In your country, children need school The more you budget for the school, the faster you can research Construction budget: a small idea: in the construction budget, make a small section called employees, where you can choose whether young and old people will do construction or old people, which has a role in construction, if a person If old people build, the speed of construction will slow down, of course, not very much, maybe one or two months, bu…

Hello everyone, There were interesting foreshadowed features about monarchy, where monarchic countries were specified by rank, like minor countries count, major countries kingdoms, etc... This feature would make the game more immersive and skirmish. This feature would be mainly automatic, except for empires and caliphate. It will be based on three factors : cultures, religion and rank. Based from the videos, I theorize that the rank order is such as it: Local power --------> Regional power --------> Minor power --------> Major power --------> Great power --------> Superpower (optional) Imagine seeing that Ottoman Empire in …

Hi, how about the idea of adding such a reform as the abolition of taxes for families with 4 children and more to the game. This reform will give a significant increase in the country's population, but will reduce tax revenues. What do you think?

Provinces can have a unique image for better immersion in the game 😛 If someone would like to create special images for provinces, here are the width and height dimensions: 600x192px 600 Width 192 Height Once the game is released, simply rename the image to the province ID and it will work.

It would be super cool if Lukash didn't leave again indefinitely after the release of the game and fix several of the hundreds of bugs, it's just that this fate happened to aoh2, Lukash just scored on the players and the popularity of the game was based only on modders and the community, it would be very cool if Lukash after the release of the game continued to add content to the game and listened to the players, otherwise I think many players will just get frustrated in the game and move on to other games

I want to create scenarios with occupied regions in AoH3 when it is released. At the start of the game, these regions will be occupied and there will be a war between the occupying country and the country that was occupied. Can you add this feature?

Hello mein people, today we'll be talking about trade, rivers, and using them in defense. Starting with, Trade and moving on rivers: Along with a better trade system we need better water ways. No this won't be a topic on navy, (get out of my head, get out of my head). But waterways, in AOH2 rivers were decor but they can be so much more, turning them into actual sea provinces. For war, and trade. An example would be, the missipi. And using boats to ship resources to a state via a boat A K A: ✨️shipping✨️. Which I think is already in AOH3. Second, Using rivers defensively: Im yoinking this one from HOI4 (🤢🤮), as you know rivers were of little…

Ucks, Ignore this guys, I was trying to make an account and seemed to have made a mistake and don't know how to delete it

Diplomacy plays a crucial role in strategy games. Expanding your civilisation peacefuly can be as much, or sometimes even more fun, than simple conquest. The community was upset when unions and ultimatums were scratched from the new release. That is why I have come up with ideas on how to balance and implement these mechanics into the game. Unions: Both nations need to be in an alliance together Both nations need to have relations over 50 Both nations need to control less than 200 provinces each One nation can form at most 2 unions per game Alternatively, you could set a rule that only pre-determined unions can be formed like: …

It's worth adding the types of economies to play: Traditional economy Planned Economy Market economy Corporate economy and other(players will be able to add them) Types of economies will give different buffs/debuffs.

I was thinking of maybe adding different types of territories for countries, there would be 3 types: -core territory basically this is the home region of a country and has to be on the same landmass as the Capital, their effects would be higher maintenance but more growth and soldier pop and a stability boost of around 10%, to core regions there must be high stability in the region and at least 10% of your pop uncored states this would be states on the same landmass as the Capital, these territories can be fully cored after 180 days and until then they would have lesser boosts and a bit higher maintenance -colonial territory this would …

I believe something that could add more to the game would be a migration system. This would mainly help countries with a small population. A system could be added where you could choose to open or close borders for migration and choose which particular people or citizens of a country can enter your nation. In addition, people of a specific religion could be chosen. This system would be useful for countries in the Americas after colonization, such as the United States in its westward expansion. Results: + X Population for each wave of immigration accepted +X Population of a given religion +X admini…

I got an idea on how to make nationalities in the game. Nation, let's take a situation, for example, China has taken over all of Korea, and they are not happy about it, and they can start uprisings. To prevent uprisings, you can try them o[insert nation name]. Claims, for example, there is North Korea, and it claims the entire Korean peninsula, but there is also South Korea, which also lays claim to the entire Korean peninsula, and this could disrupt relations between the two states. This problem can be solved by recognizing the territories claimed by this state. Culture, for example, South Korea has captured North Korea, North Koreans may not accept the cu…

It would be richer to add the detail of war sounds depending on our armies in each era and include a war easter egg sound. For example, in medieval battles you will hear swords clashing together depending on the number and types of units. If there are less than 1000 units in a battle, only a few sword-rattling will be heard. But if there are thousands of units, you will hear swords clashing every second. Of course that is if the units are purely knights. The sounds would be more varied if archers, artillery, cavalry (horse pounding) are included. Even voices, although it would be very time-consuming to add natural voices from each country and era, especiall…

A simple mechanic! Demolishing buildings opens up space for good roleplay, and for optimizing your production. For example, during the Middle Ages perhaps the player had a large number of farms. However, as it goes through the industrial revolution and begins to move towards modern days, it may want to "modernize" its economic machine, replacing farms with mechanized farms.

I immediately apologize for my English, as I write through a translator. @Łukasz Jakowski ======================================================================================================================= I suggest you make a system of autonomy levels for puppets. The higher the level of autonomy, the less the suzerain teaches bonuses. for example, it is impossible to build on the territory of a vassal, the color changes from the color of the suzerain to its own color, the state gives fewer recruits and tribute than at a similar level of tribute collection, but with a lower level of autonomy. also, for the sake of historicity, I propose…

Nothing too fancy, but I would like AOH3 to have traditional capitals: What this means is: -Each civ will have one or a few provinces which the AI will have a tendency to move their capital to if they have the chance. Example: The Ottomans in 1440 should have a tendency to move their capital to Constantinopole as that was what happened The Austrians should have a tendency to move their capital to Vienna etc..

Linux users like my self can't play mods or the game without proton. also if you want to play mods there is issue simply because wine and java Expanded User Base: By supporting Linux, the game would attract a larger audience. Many games and strategy enthusiasts use Linux, and accommodating this platform would open up the game to a wider demographic. Community and Modding: Linux users often have strong programming skills and a passion for modding. Providing Linux support could foster a vibrant modding community, enhancing the game's longevity and depth through user-generated content. User Satisfaction and Inclusivity: Offering Linux sup…