Suggestions

Hello, dear Jakowski, I think a scenario in which the Turks entered Anatolia in 1071 or a scenario about the wars of the Anatolian Seljuks with the Byzantines and the Mongols would be nice, because the Turks' entry into Anatolia in 1453 is a big event for both Europe and Asia. This can be done in events. I wish you good luck with your game, greetings from Turkey.

What About This - someone makes a website that makes text file events way easier for everyone? this keeps in the text file format and fixes the issue you guys have with the old editor while not upsetting android users

Sadly nearly ALL THE EDITOR FEATURES HAVE BEEN LOCKED BEHIND TXT FILES, EVEN CREATING CUSTOM CIVS, which i find very annoying and completely destroys the charm of aoh2 where anyone from mobile or PC could Add their Own Civilizations and events and someone using android could do everything someone on PC could, now it feels like its not only locked in for PC users since such files wont be as accessible for android users without certain apps (and nobody is going to click through 234093543 files just to add a new custom civilization on android since most of the android gamers are very young people who don't know all that) and also it feels like its moving towards a modder spe…

Здравствуйте Lukasz. Что я вам предлагаю - сбомобности для стран, и для всех они уникальны. За политическую власть Примеры: Украина - секретное перевооружение. Китай - поднятие экономики Индия - поднятие роста населения Швейцария - отмена всех войн Финляндия - поднятие счастья Америка - соединение всех штатов в случае распада Россия - ядерное перевооружение Польша - независимость какой либо захваченной страны Великобритания - водное перевооружение Думаю на этом хватит, дальше ты можешь сам что то придумать

After the conquest of Istanbul, Pope John II. He made an offer to Mehmet and the offer said: If you become a Christian, you will be the leader of Europe Thereupon, an event happened to the Ottomans in 1453: Either become Christian or remain Muslim. If we become Christians let us join the Holy Rome

^

Every country has certain countries with which it is more willing to cooperate. I propose to introduce a "friends" option that works exactly the same as the rivals option; instead of making the relationship worse faster, it improve the relationship faster For example Poland and Hungary

Trade System: Create a dynamic trade system where players can exchange resources. The value of resources can fluctuate based on supply and demand, encouraging players to strategically trade for maximum profit. Army Supply System: Implement a system where armies need a continuous supply of resources to maintain their strength. This includes weapons, armor, and other equipment. Players must ensure their supply lines are secure and efficient to keep their armies at peak performance. Food and Production Mechanics: Incorporate the need for food for both civilian population and armies. Players need to manage th…

the ai always stay the same civilization, even after 5 thousands rounds, i think in aoh3 it would be good if the ai could form new civilizations too

The Idea Is - Since Unions Are Too OP Then Maybe Personal Unions ARE the way to go - The Idea Of Personal Unions Relies On One King Ex: The King Of Austria Serving as the monarch to multiple other Kingdoms Ex: Styria, Bohemia ETC ETC, all the civs would have the same color which will be the color of the civ the player chose, the player will have the option to appoint someone represent him for that civilization and keep it stable, and you are able to build, develop, Control Diplomacy thru the diplomacy tab where you would have the options to declare war only and do anything you would be able to do with a normal civilization, you can even recruit armies to help you fight an…

For example, I want to disable/enable neutral land colonization for every nation after trigger. Or increase the lethality of diseases after another trigger.

This is must and manny countries was under it and in modern day we have new state of talibans that formed,iran,saudi,qatar…

Im not exactly sure if this is already a part of the plan, but i will suggest it regardless. If the player is watching the timelapse of a game, and their map is zoomed out; Each individual army will be represented as their country’s flag instead of numbers. Something like the Hearts Of Iron IV timelapses that you see on YouTube. Thoughts? In my opinion, i think it looks really cool because it showcases the sheer scale and size of a war happening in the game that you are not really able to see when viewing it through a timelapse in AOH2. Here are some images for reference:

Will civil wars in modern scenario (Somalia, yemen, Libya, syria, Ukraine conflict (lpr & dpr) etc) be pressnt @Łukasz Jakowski

It is known that during a war, the economy of the country changes - at the beginning, spending on the army increases, and when the war goes badly, or if it has lasted too long, the recruitment of civilians into the army increases, which reduces the population and economy Therefore, when setting the budget, I think that in army maintenance, if we select the "increased pay" option, we should get two additional minuses: -1% population and -5% economy. This option should be used by AI only when the bot is losing the war or after 2 years when manpower runs out. The "default" option should be enabled by AI at the beginning of war, and the "decreased pay" option should be e…

A country powerful enough can have the ability to create an international council and basically choose the leaders of this council, kinda like the UN, this however is not to be confused with an economic or military alliance, this is no alliance. This could lead to: Countries imposing sanctions on another country (with justification, like them taking over another territory without justification, kinda like the casus beli in eu4.) And if other countries happen to have bad relations with the nation that is imposing the sanctions, they'll end up vetoeing against it. However, they can also abstain if they are a neutral nation (positive or negative relations with both…

I propose that declaring war is only possible with relations - 25, but declaring war against a country with a different religion is possible easier with relations - 15 Or faster damaging relations between countries that have different religions

I don't have a detailed idea so help me in comments My general thought is to have some attraction buildings in the game such as wonders, airports, tourism centers, etc which attracts tourists. Also high stability causes more tourists come to your country. Beside its economical bonuses it can have benefits such converting your religion in first stages of game or maybe improving your relations with other countries or anything else that makes sense about tourism

i think this would be a good idea for sharing creations with other users

In the game there could be different types of defenses a player can create. Those being trenches, forts, bunkers, beach fortifications (like Normandy) etc. There could be a map mode that allows you to see them, and areas with these fortifications could be harder to conquer, however, they'll only function if there are troops in the defended area. The player could also have the ability to lay landmines in a certain province, to deteriorate the enemy's troops. The NPC of course can also have the ability to do this as well. This could make WW2 scenarios better as players can have the ability to fortify places like Alsace-Lorraine for a more accurate scenar…

AOH2 was easy to assimilate and easy to suppress rebellions. I believe that assimilation should be completely removed, and instead a panel of occupied territories should be made, where broad autonomy could be given, or, on the contrary, very low, and so that the rebels would be many times stronger

So i posted a topic about tourism and got comments about migration so decided to post another and talk about that I don't know how much the game is near to reality but I talk about real word then we can decide which parts are useful for the game Migrations categorized by reasons: Natural reasons: flooding, earth quake or other disasters in old living place and fertile lands in new one Artificial reasons: bad economical situation, war or dictatorship in old living place and better economy and stability in new one

Countries can have the option to create companies, and those companies can expand throughout the world through trade. Many of them being arms companies, motor companies etc. This could lead to allies using each-other's companies to create different types of weapons, companies can also boost the speed a weapon is made/a vehicle/soldier is created. Also the better/more popular a company is, the more stronger the soldiers will be. These companies can be custom or already existing ones (depending on player choice.)

Currently it is the Soviet Union which does not make sense, when it is not a union of multiple nations. Instead it should be Russian Soviet Federative Socialist Republic OR Russian SFSR for short The same could (in theory) apply to other nations, especially the post-soviet ones.

Isn't there a feature to change the flag in the game? What I mean is,We can change ideologies when playing games, or even change names in the previous AOH2 series.. So maybe it would be better to add a feature to change flags during the game, I usually release a vassal country and play as a vassal country because there is no this feature, right... I'm not forcing, I'm just sharing ideas😁