Suggestions

Hello Lukazs, I have seen the recent video and I would like to suggest that we can only intervene in wars when: We are World Powers, Regional Powers or when we have a high friendly relationship with one of the two sides. What do you think about this?

So, countries are divided into multiple military districts(zones), which are handled by generals, each zone provides 1 supply hub in major cities of the said zones, the generals are lower ranked and usually take orders by the player and the military advisor. Smaller countries to 20 provinces will have 2 zones, countries with 21 - 40 provinces will have 3 military zones, countries with 41-70 will have 4 and any more will have 5 military zones, but the player can create them manually too. The reason I had this idea is because I remembered Russia has multiple military districts, and the southern one is managed by Gerasimov. @Outlawexperience @Łuka…

Yep.

Greetings! I have made this translation for croatian language, I saw that someone made translation for Bosnian/Croatian/Serbian, but that translation uses words and forms that are not used in croatia, so I've made this translation from scratch. If there is some stuff that can be translated better, feel free to correct me. Keep in mind that i tried to use croatian expressions over internationalisms. translation_hr.txt

volunteer unit in foreign conflict (like hoi4), also manpower and Economic aid. @Łukasz Jakowski

In this topic, we write the names of cities that should change their name depending on who controls the province. Example: Germany: Gdańsk=Danzig Wrocław=Breslau Byzantine Empire Istanbul=Constantinople Vatican Rome=Vatican A list of all cities in the game is attached. cities.json

As technology develops and eras change, some ideologies/regimes should acquire noticeable debuffs, since they have already exhausted their progressive sides and now, on the contrary, are stopping development. That is, if outdated ideologies are preserved, the lag of such a country in economic and scientific development will accumulate over time. This will avoid the widespread spread of absolute monarchies, nomadic hordes or tribal federations in the 20-21st century A similar idea to this is presented in the following sentence:

You could add an option to be the one who decides the negotiations, for example, there are several wars in a game and in the wars a winner comes out instead of the one who decides being the winning country, it is the player who controls the game. It would seem like an interesting mechanic because I sincerely want to control a game that way, I hope that if you add it it would be an original mechanic.

I noticed in the videos that after selecting a country and pressing the play button, it seems like nothing happens, which can be a bit underwhelming. It would enhance the experience if there were a sound effect, similar to what we hear in HOI4, to signal that the game is starting or transitioning into play.

1. can a ruler rule two countries at the same time 2. Will there be any female rulers like Elizabeth I for example?

I've asked this question before, but now it's more interesting to me than ever. Since any of my questions on the forum have six ideas inside it and no one answers to the point, I will ask it in TOPIC. Will there be anything that will threaten the player in the game itself, other than coalitions? Maybe there will be a unique state. There, for example, in 1789 there will be a superevent for the revolution and France will be given mega bonuses and the king will be overthrown, and a new political regime with a bunch of military bonuses and a handsome Napoleon in power will come in his place. I would like to see crises in the game, all sorts of gameplay-compl…

So i believe that the province "Miastko" (at least it looks like it) should be changed to "Bytów"". Bytów is in the terrain of this province and it is bigger than miastko, it also has a bigger population currently and has a Powiat in poland that includes the Miastko County, so i believe that Bytów should be the name for this province.

Checmixal weopons can be simpy chemical bombs realstic for ww1 scenrio As for biologixal weopons idk.how rhey could work but ik they were first used by mongols Maybe the ui can have a dispalyed amount of chemcixal & biolgoical weopons displayed amount a Player has next to the nuke counter @Łukasz Jakowski

it's pretty simple: i think you should make it so that puppet states are taken in as part of the land for the formable provinces needed since they pretty much are, this feature should be implemented but balanced when a future centralization/autonomy system is added, but until then it makes no sense to keep puppets as unowned land for formables, they arent annexed when forming the civilization or anything btw

The best way to avoid piracy is multiplayer, people will have the only solution to buy the game.

Events are important tools in modding in both Age of History II and Age of History III, so I'd like to offer a few ideas for implementing events in a future game, namely: Music during events or superevent. They are native to Hearts of Iron IV, but are also implemented in some modifications of AoH2. Their addition will allow modders to provide atmosphere to their mods. Change of rulers by decision of the event. As the rulers started to play a bigger role than in the second part, this addition will become extremely important. It will avoid adding duplicate countries for other rulers. World events. Events can come not only to one country, but to all civi…

Dear Łukasz, I love how the game turned out and I m impress how you manage to make each province have historical accurate names. You even made titles of leaders change according to ideology of country. But there is one thing that's I think should be improved to make game more realistic. There's a need to modify the current sea warfare and invasion mechanics because troops fight on see the same way as on land and that is unrealistic and just bad looking, imagine a medieval army fighting in the middle of the ocean. I believe a game as Age of History 3 deserves better mechanics. And here is the solution: Addition of ships. Ships will be produced like troops but only in …

If its not added already, thx

Maybe this can work as impassable Terrain type kinda like hoi4 idk but it wouldnt be too hard making Terrain thats physically there so like not a wasteland but simply milliatrally impassable and can also be applied to areas like Sahara, rub al khali, thick jungles like Amazon or himayalas region basically impassable zone which soliders cant pass thru @Łukasz Jakowski

Because it makes up a few states in the Western part of the usa as images attached below: It also is seperate from Protestantism & cathocalism so ya

like it was in aoh2 when u ended the game u saw ur country progress till the point the prsn decided to end the game is that Mode in aoh3 as it was cool @Łukasz Jakowski

Idea is if you had vassal in require land you don't need to annex them.you can form the civilization you like and you vassal will be still your vassal

Hi Lukas 3 countries r inaccurate in the ww2 scnerio The biggest is china which is missing alot of warlord states that existed back then, that should be added either before Launch or as a future ww2 dlc or something Furthmore, Oman should be divided into 2, the normal Oman which is sunni ig plus the imamate which is ibadi And yemen, the british part of it should also be abit more fragmeneted since there are things like the Kathri state, mahra & Qu'aiti State of Shihr and Mukalla Yes these r the main 3 @Łukasz Jakowski Also ik canals arent a thing ingame but it would still be nice to have a province or two under brit…

¿Naval War In DLC?

age of history3 multi playable??