Ideas
2,781 topics in this forum
-
- 2 replies
- 1.4k views
The thing is that I, for example, playing for Russia in WW1 want to liberate Poland and start playing for it, but since it has no national provinces I can't do it. Obviously, it is difficult to work out national provinces for each country in each scenario, but why not do it like in Aoh2? There you could choose any country you wanted, or even create your own right away, and release on some territories. This also gives a great opportunity to divide, for example, Germany in World War II into Reich Commissariats and Protectorates.
Last reply by panszop, -
-
- 1 follower
- 2 replies
- 1.2k views
Why do I say this? Well, the peace deals leave a lot to be desired in AoH3, and it is by far what I hate the most about the game. I like the new demands, but how come we can't give provinces to our own allies? Or argue more with the enemy country? In AoH2 the peace deals were much better, despite not having as many war demands, you could select your own allies and give them provinces or other demands to the enemy, we could also do the same with the enemy, we could give them provinces from our allies or ourselves, in exchange for other territories or war reparations or other things. That's why I say that a rework of the peace deals is necessary, it would give a b…
Last reply by panszop, -
- 1 reply
- 966 views
Basically, add a mechanic called prosperity, where if you aren't at war time, it slowly ticks up, and if you are at war time, it ticks down. If prosperity is high enough, the province will improve its manpower and growth rate over time. SLOWLY, very slowly, so it is not op. On the other hand, having any devastation in a province will get rid of its prosperity, and decrease its manpower and growth rate rather quickly. Nukes should delete all prosperity, and most growth rate and manpower from a province. They currently only delete a bit of the population and economy.
Last reply by YouravaragebrazilianAoCfan, -
- 3 replies
- 798 views
Add no annex provinces option to vassals tab. With it, when the vassals win a war, we don't need to worry about vassals having more provinces
Last reply by angamo123, -
- 0 replies
- 501 views
The idea will make AI form a "Formable nations" and will make the games much more fun and deep and sometimes i just like to Observe games... The issue with making this happening is cores... Option A: Cores transform to the new formable nation (example: England become UK) Option B: Cores doesn't transform to the new formable nation (example England become UK but cores will stay as England and every new core will be part of the England cores) SO UK will be just a name changer not a real change I prefer second option in case of losing to coalition I do not want UK to be nation of 1 province as example and Formable nations should be able to make Formable natio…
Last reply by eNeXPii, -
- 1 reply
- 552 views
Each province should have 2-3 resources
Last reply by angamo123, -
- 1 follower
- 5 replies
- 1.2k views
In late game, nuke is very annoying. AI spam nuke a lot. It would be better to have a button to turn off nuke in game setting tab (tab has sandbox, difficulty mode)
Last reply by angamo123, -
- 2 followers
- 4 replies
- 1.1k views
AI creating formable civilizations I think that AI should be able to form a civilization when having control under all required provinces. Selling Provinces We should be able to sell a province by double clicking at it or use a brush to select multiple provinces. Searching provinces using the list is very annoying and time consuming. Peace treaty There should be an ability when releasing conquered civilizations to select provinces that the civilization will get. There should be also an ability to give some land to our vassals or allies. Fractions I think there should be fractions (like NATO or Warsaw Pact) in AoH3. The fractions would be creat…
Last reply by Thee OG Emerald EYE, -
- 0 replies
- 949 views
1.Hiệp ước Hiệp ước là một thỏa thuận pháp lý quốc tế, được ký kết giữa các quốc gia hoặc các tổ chức quốc tế. Nội dung của hiệp ước rất đa dạng, từ các vấn đề chính trị, kinh tế, văn hóa, xã hội đến các vấn đề kỹ thuật. Phân loại các hiệp ước Có nhiều cách phân loại hiệp ước, tùy thuộc vào góc nhìn mà chúng được xem xét. Sau đây là một số phân loại phổ biến: Theo số lượng các bên tham gia Hiệp ước song phương: Giữa hai quốc gia. Hiệp ước đa phương: Giữa nhiều quốc gia. Theo nội dung Hiệp ước chính trị: Bao gồm các vấn đề như thiết lập quan hệ ngoại giao, giải quyết tranh chấp, hợp tác quốc phòng, v.v. Hiệp ước kinh tế: Liên q…
Last reply by khang, -
- 0 replies
- 691 views
@Łukasz Jakowski Thanks for caring about the game after release. This ideas could be also released in nearest update with better provinces transfer and multiplayer(?). I know that all these features couldn't be added but who knows... Suport rebels Forgotten feature from AoH2. Would be glad to see it again in AoH3 and I'm sure that many peoples would agree with my opinion. I also think it could be made somehow with spies(spies could become more useful) Create own HRE type alliance(defensive alliance) during the game + option to join existing HRE alliance(defensive alliance). Why I couldn't join NATO for example? I think HRE alliances should be corrected…
Last reply by Casual, -
- 2 followers
- 2 replies
- 1.2k views
It feels weird seeing all the Chinese warlords in the Fall of the Han Dynasty scenario having ancient Greek hoplites in their starting armies. (and don't think about the Battle of Zhizhi, there's no way Lukasz is referencing that) I think modders would be overjoyed if we could add unique army units specifically for different civs or scenarios. Perhaps this could be done in a manner similar to adding custom mission trees for said scenarios. Now with civ-specific army units would come the issue of linking them to the tech tree, which itself is not civ-specific. We (the players who support this feature) would have to brainstorm a solution before Lukasz can add it. There…
Last reply by Ilovethisgame2, -
- 0 replies
- 532 views
This was originally supposed to be in the game, but I suppose that the developer forgot about this. Anyways, I'd like to present an idea for this game: Which that, depending on the group of the nation, like Chinese or Turks, have their own special-buildings and units. That'd be it, I guess?
Last reply by Popooy, -
- 2 followers
- 7 replies
- 1.5k views
The official version of the local editor will be released within a month after the release of the calendar three to be compatible with the calendar three, and it will not be released before that (thousands of lines of code are being refactored to support more editing functions and bug fixes, at least it cannot be completed before the National Day, but after completion, it can be edited and even automatically generated with a provincial link, and exported to a form that can be used directly, so stay tuned.) @Brianman@BurgerMan@ExistenceDaVitaReduxDev@Historyk@TheAngryProgressive@JurMax@bun_dha4@BigCrow@davidcalebe
Last reply by Historyk, -
- 0 replies
- 576 views
hi guys can someone please make a mod for the world of ice and fire with different scenario
Last reply by Abdulraheem1999, -
- 1 follower
- 0 replies
- 1.3k views
Czy mógłby Pan dodać opcję, dzięki której możemy ustalić maksymalną ilość armii? Pasowało by to do bardziej współczesnych scenariuszy . Chciałbym jeszcze zgłosić (chyba błąd) mianowicie chodzi mi o to, że gdy zaatakujemy jakieś państwo nawet gdy armia przeciwnika w nas wchodzi w polu bitwy jesteśmy ustawieni jako atakujący. Myślę, że AI w żadnym wypadku nie powinno atakować gracza bez generała i przewagi liczebnej.
Last reply by marszalek, -
- 0 replies
- 521 views
As above. Though it should somewhat be similar to of the Steam's Workshop.
Last reply by Popooy, -
- 0 replies
- 768 views
I noticed that due to the fact that when adding a new technology ID, the entire technology tree is rewritten, which makes it impossible to run 2 mods with technologies I propose to make it so that the technology IDs do not rewrite the entire technology tree, but only the technology IDs
Last reply by Fire Quickly, -
- 0 replies
- 814 views
Allow us to release completely custom civilisations as puppets into the game, created directly in the release a vassal interface. I can see that balancing could be an issue, but as long as it's a single player game, that shouldn't be a problem.
Last reply by Trashcycling, -
- 0 replies
- 890 views
In AoH 2, if a province has more than two cores it's possible to set how the population is distributed between the cores. In AoH 3, well... you can't. Every time you start a new game the distribution is randomized. With two cores, sometimes the share is almost 50/50, other times almost 55/45 or 60/40. Basically the idea is: Be possible to set the population distribution between the cores in the scenario editor of AoH 3 like it's possible in the previous game. Example below from the core editor of AoH 2:
Last reply by Iceman, -
- 1 follower
- 0 replies
- 589 views
heeeeeey lukasz. how d you think about idea to give steam keys to popular modmakers, who maked popular mods for aoh2?
Last reply by mycat, -
- 2 followers
- 6 replies
- 1.4k views
Last reply by Das Moss Man, -
.thumb.png.1070fa079c7536cdf4061cac82260db0.png)
- 3 followers
- 57 replies
- 9.3k views
Hello Guys! If you like these ideas, then comment and react to the post so that the probability that Lukasz will see it is higher and therefore the probability that features will be adopted from this list! So i bought Aoh3 and i think we really need these features : -VERY IMPORTANT : Better and more Editor options ingame (Because not everyone can mod or plays on pc.) - One click build in all provinces - Multiplayer? - Maybe a focus tree system? (A focus tree system like in hoi4 which you can edit in scenario editor for different nations) - Civ Editor : Options for Different Names und Flags for different Religions and Ideologies …
Last reply by Mega4oSS, -
I think if we win a siege, the lands we have conquered should have a slight population decline, and slight decrease in growth rate, for a certain time like 5 years. @Łukasz Jakowski
Last reply by Wronislaw, -
- 0 replies
- 465 views
Can you add the required technology as a condition for building a certain wonder? I think it's important
Last reply by Pnompenb, -
- 0 replies
- 1.1k views
Since Lukasz Jakowski made the game exclusively for ancient times, many mechanics, and not only, are not compatible with modern scenarios and not only. 1. I agree with the combat system, if you try, even from this combat system you can make a front line without mods, just if Lukasz slightly changes the behavior of the AI with the help of technology. So that the divisions can line up in a front. 2. Selling provinces, let's say I captured Poland for Germany and as history give Vilnius to Lithuania, and the east of the USSR, and in the tab there you will have to manually search for each province to give them. This is so inconvenient that it is better not to give them to anyo…
Last reply by Indepci,
-
Recent Achievements
-
-
Posts