Suggestions

Given multiplayer managed to work and you originally said it was quite unlikely for a multiplayer at first, could it be possible to fix the ai to actually use a navy possibly (and maybe trade)

Agressive expanison should increse chance of bots making defense pacts , coalitions (similar to age of history 2 coalitions) and declaring wars against you . Not like In current system when all neighboring cuntries declare war on you at the same time. Current system looks and feels un finished. Remeake it pls.

Border looks bad all prowices line up with Ren River Exept Sayn. Fix Sayn prowince border plss 🥺🥺🥺

Coalitions should be hard to defend but still manageable. This is not the case in the game however. If you're a small country in the early game and you have just a few neighbours, you're not attacked by a large force but you're broke and you cant afford to have enough army to defend yourself. If you're a large country in late game that has more prestige than the remaining top 5 combined, you have a ton of neighbours and even though you have a lot of money and a high regiment limit, your neighbours always have more. There's no point in the game that beating coalitions is a manageable task. Except maybe getting lucky a few times. It shouldn't be this way but if this is how …

Add integration of vassal system, but this time make it working and balanced not like how it was in age of history 2

Curently we have only 3 options: -Total Louse -Nothing -Total Victory Meke it similar to what was in age of history 2 (with all news funcions like taking gold) There you didn't have to concwer 90% of land to sighn piece treatie. Curently system will be realy anoyng in multiplayer.

Also do you have any plans to add the old features from the previous game such as ultimatums, also fixing the current alliance system would be nice and making it so your vassals can't join other civs alliances

I am not a professional animator I just make this for fun;)

hi @lukasz Jakoski, Can you redo the selling feature of the provinces more intuitive by choosing the provinces on the map instead of the list?

Now the tribes of Siberia, Africa and the New World have inflated technologies. Because of this, they quickly catch up with other countries, organize and colonize the entire territory before anyone from Europe or Asia arrives there. And in general, the balance of technologies among different civilizations in basic scenarios is very strange. It is worth reconsidering the initial level of technology of various civilizations

i personally see that its illogical for a country to join a coalition war against me no matter our relations so i think there should be set a certaine level of relations for a country to have the ability to join or declare a coalition war against the player

not much to add about it

@Lukasz Jakowski i will elaborate, basically. I made a fascist greater afghanistan formable which uses the afg_f tag but it didn't generate in game. Then i made a bau_w lucayan federation formable which also didn't generate in game. I don't know if this is a bug or not but you should make it so we can make ideologies into formables too.

Release any province and it gets the core. Economic status of each province, such as comfortable, wealthy, etc. Happiness status of each province. Revolt rate depends on economy, happiness, religion, culture. Possible emigration from provinces with bad economy. Each province can have several religion groups which are shown in % and several culture groups. Promoting culture or religion consumes legacy points. Similar to the Victoria game where you have multiple but limited focus points to promote or convert something, but this game could have limited legacy points instead. Countries can make other cultures acceptable. Countries can make relig…

Hi Mr. Jakowski, I think u have already read this once before but I made some changes and here is all the Ideas I have. I wanted to share some ideas and suggestions for Age of History 3 that I believe could enhance the game experience. I appreciate your patience in reading through these, and I would love to hear your thoughts on them. First, I encountered a bug: • When creating a civilization, there are no flag symbols available as in Age of Civilizations 2. Additionally, any custom flag created disappears in-game, replaced by a question mark. A few observations: • In the modern world scenario, a province in Russia's Far East is mistakenly assi…

Hi guys, PLS READ THESE I SAID, AND IF POSSIBLE MR.JAKOWSKI READ AS WELL🌹🫶 FIRST of all I found some annoying bugs. No Menu Button for saving or exiting the game for android! I uploaded a screenshot of the game in the link below, pls check it. https://drive.google.com/file/d/11TWvFtmzuI5vAwp0KMqOsEgDSDK4E0lx/view?usp=drivesdk There is a bug, When creating civiliazation there are no symbol for flags like age of civiliazation 2 and even if u make a casual flag, when u go to the game the flag is removed and a question mark is on it. In modern world I noticed a Province of Russia Far East is accidentally given to China. Now on to the suggestions …

I'm currently making my AoHIII version of 1800 scenario and when i painted the map i found that the Sayn province (located along side the Rhine River) is going through the river and not stopping on the river band like the other provinces nearby. It would be interesting to cut the province into to new provinces (for historical accuracy)

hey guys can anyone make a mode of song of ice and fire

@Łukasz Jakowski byłaby może opcja abyś dodał więcej możliwych bonusów/minusów za taktyki np. bonus do szybkości armii albo bonus do szybkości oblężeń?

In this topic you can write your ideas for formable Civilizations for the game. It can be real/fictional/meme/funny. Template: Name: Flag: Link to image What civilizations can create it: Provinces that must be controlled to from a civilization:

Is this better than orignal? Using flag for different unit?..

PEOPLE WANT THE OLD DIPLOMACY PEOPLE WANT THE OLD PEACE TREATIES PEOPLE WANT THE OLD VASSAL SYSTEM PEOPLE WANT FEATURES BACK SUCH AS ULTIMATUM, UNIONS, TRADE PEOPLE WANT OLD ALLIANCES

The thing is that I, for example, playing for Russia in WW1 want to liberate Poland and start playing for it, but since it has no national provinces I can't do it. Obviously, it is difficult to work out national provinces for each country in each scenario, but why not do it like in Aoh2? There you could choose any country you wanted, or even create your own right away, and release on some territories. This also gives a great opportunity to divide, for example, Germany in World War II into Reich Commissariats and Protectorates.

Why do I say this? Well, the peace deals leave a lot to be desired in AoH3, and it is by far what I hate the most about the game. I like the new demands, but how come we can't give provinces to our own allies? Or argue more with the enemy country? In AoH2 the peace deals were much better, despite not having as many war demands, you could select your own allies and give them provinces or other demands to the enemy, we could also do the same with the enemy, we could give them provinces from our allies or ourselves, in exchange for other territories or war reparations or other things. That's why I say that a rework of the peace deals is necessary, it would give a b…

Basically, add a mechanic called prosperity, where if you aren't at war time, it slowly ticks up, and if you are at war time, it ticks down. If prosperity is high enough, the province will improve its manpower and growth rate over time. SLOWLY, very slowly, so it is not op. On the other hand, having any devastation in a province will get rid of its prosperity, and decrease its manpower and growth rate rather quickly. Nukes should delete all prosperity, and most growth rate and manpower from a province. They currently only delete a bit of the population and economy.