Jump to content
Age of Civilizations
EmpirePlanner145

Reform on how we recruit an Army

Recommended Posts

Instead of building a army using money, scrap that and have it being that it require that province's population to build a army.

This will make so that your gold can not quickly build a army in one turn. 

Example, you select provinces that will build a army for you based off of the population the province has.

Population of 25000, would be able to recruit a army of 1500 but it would take 3 turns.

Each turn makes 500 units

There needs to be a new building so that you can train a army. The higher the level the building is the faster and more units you can build.

The cost would increase the military upkeep.

This would allow a nation prepared for war, have a higher chance of winning.

Even if you are a small nation but have time to build up a army without costing gold would be ideal in terms for war.

A Big Nation will always out produce units because of gold but take that away then this allows a small nation to take down a big nation or at least get them to agree to a peace deal in the small nation favor.

Having these buildings in the game would allow strategic planning since now you know where you should plan your attack.

You would want to take out their building so they cant counter attack or build a army close enough.

With what we currently have a Nation with a high budget can build a army of 2500 in one turn, which is annoying because you probably was prepared for war but suddenly they out number you.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

An additional building may not be necessary, for the existing armory may take on the additional benefit under your proposal.

Also maybe one could invest tech points into recruitment as well.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think the idea is nice but not phrased properly. Population is already a factor in how much you can recruit out of a province. What you're suggesting is that this recruitment should be divided into turns (500 per turn to 1500 in your example). A nation with a smaller population then being able to recruit 200 per turn to 600 in a province. I like that.

Gold is most intensely used when you're at war; buildings are not that significant. You would have little reason to keep money in the game if recruitment won't depend on it.

Edited by Kemalakkus

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 hours ago, Kemalakkus said:

I think the idea is nice but not phrased properly. Population is already a factor in how much you can recruit out of a province. What you're suggesting is that this recruitment should be divided into turns (500 per turn to 1500 in your example). A nation with a smaller population then being able to recruit 200 per turn to 600 in a province. I like that.

Gold is most intensely used when you're at war; buildings are not that significant. You would have little reason to keep money in the game if recruitment won't depend on it.

Money should be used for other things, such as building infrastructure.

Having a bigger economy shouldnt mean you should be able to rush through a war. There should be potential for it but if you do not prepare for war then you would be less likely to win.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
13 hours ago, Texas said:

An additional building may not be necessary, for the existing armory may take on the additional benefit under your proposal.

Also maybe one could invest tech points into recruitment as well.

Right, focus on building the economy or development.

Maybe even having certain governments be able to have a quicker recruitment rate.

The only other thing I would add to this is that supplies should be a major thing. If a invading army is staying in a province for too long then will run out of supplies.

In a way limit how big a army can get

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Actually, maybe just scrap the whole recruitment feature and turn it into mobilization. In a country tab, you can decide to mobilize, and then decide how much % of your population you want to mobilize. The bigger the percent you mobilize, the higher negatives from economy you get. Mobilizing would also cost 1 gold per pop you mobilize. Max would be 5% of your population (with soldiers counting towards the population). Also, when mobilized, you get a happiness boost depending on the percent you're mobilizing times 10, so if you mobilize 1%, that's -10% happiness and so on. Mobilization would work by mobilizing 20% of the full number each turn, so it'd take 5 turns to get all your pops mobilized.

You'd still be able to hire mercenaries (basically the conscript feature) which work the way they do, but cost a lot more.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
50 minutes ago, Sneaky said:

Actually, maybe just scrap the whole recruitment feature and turn it into mobilization. In a country tab, you can decide to mobilize, and then decide how much % of your population you want to mobilize. The bigger the percent you mobilize, the higher negatives from economy you get. Mobilizing would also cost 1 gold per pop you mobilize. Max would be 5% of your population (with soldiers counting towards the population). Also, when mobilized, you get a happiness boost depending on the percent you're mobilizing times 10, so if you mobilize 1%, that's -10% happiness and so on. Mobilization would work by mobilizing 20% of the full number each turn, so it'd take 5 turns to get all your pops mobilized.

You'd still be able to hire mercenaries (basically the conscript feature) which work the way they do, but cost a lot more.

You are right but a bit more balanced.

But so far we are heading the right direction

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Similar Content

    • By Dave ☢
      It's just a minor idea, but looking at the fact that leaders have custom traits and such (A. K. A. a leader can change a country with it's bonuses) i think it wouldn't be a bad idea to add a "Change ruler/leader" option for event outcomes to create more creative scenarios!
      -Dave
    • By Ninetiethbeef08
      Army doesn't have enough depth to it. Could we have different units or divisions kinda like Hoi4 but not that complex 
      Also maybe Volunteers divisions to help out and expeditionary also military equipment to supply your troop and occupation policies  
      anything is better than watching numbers and arrows
    • By Victor
      1. Civil war has been beafore goverment (not always),  it will depend on happines.
      2. Leaders dead  it will depend on random date or death in the battle or old years.
      Sorry for my English 🙂 
    • By MoscowSuchAWonderfulPlace
      We already have ground units so why not airplanes?
      Make them unlocked after reaching a certain age and with a high level of technology, you can build them but they're very expensive and can break easily in battle, you need an Airport building to construct and store your planes, you can then select them and choose a province to either defend it (gives a defense bonus to your ground units) or attack it (gives an attack bonus to your ground units), they would mainly be used for support, and the more planes you have the higher the bonus is, but there's a limit of how many planes can be in a certain province, and if there are enemy planes in the province your planes are, then the bonuses will be lowered and the planes will engage in battle.
    • By Ciao Ciao
      Welllll, these are some of my ideas to improve the game:
      -better trade request: I was playing with Nazi Germany and I had all provinces of Greater German Reich exept for two siberian provinces owned by British Raj. I was the first in the leaderboard and Raj was 2th. I couldn't risk too much so I asked him to do a trade request: he gave me that 2 provinces and I would gave him 10.000.000 money. He refused.... I asked him another time with more of 10 million but he still refused. So I would like that trade request'll be better. For example with provinces trading. Also I've noticed that AI except for coalitions doesn't do trade request at all
      -Add a brush tool in the game, so we can select multiple provinces and build buildings/raise happiness/stability ecc in one time
      -Add a brush tool into scenario editor into relations so we can select a country and raise or decrease relations of multiple countries in one time
      -better wars: damn... how can it be possible that Pakistan conquers all of China.... or that Poland and Belgium can destroy Nazi Germany
      -select ideologies of our vassals when we create them
      -improve the importance of ideologies because sometimes it happens that third reich is friend with UK and France but is enemy with Italy, or that USA and URSS are friends
      -to add new editors like the goverment creator or to add suggested owners into a province instead to do it into AOC files because it's easier to make mistakes
      -better alliances: I've noticed that AI never makes alliances with 3 or more members. Also In the game you can't edit the name of your alliance (I think)
      -better colonies: as others have already said to give a name to your colonies like name of the nation + name of the region colonized like: Italian Guyana or Belgian South East Asia. Also to create a new tipe of vassal (the colony)
      -and lastly to add revolutionary risk into the scenario editor instead to set to 0% the level of happiness
      I hope you enjoyed at least one of these ideas and that at least one of these will be done.
      Sorry for mistakes
  • Popular Now

×
×
  • Create New...